Clinical evaluation and quantitative occlusal change analysis of posterior implant-supported all-ceramic crowns: A 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 37526213
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.14151
Clinical evaluation and quantitative occlusal change analysis of posterior implant-supported all-ceramic crowns: A 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the survival and complication rates of posterior screw-retained monolithic lithium disilicate (LS2 )/veneered zirconia (ZrO2 ) single implant crowns (SICs), as well as analyze the occlusal changes observed during a 3-year follow-up period.
Materials and methods: Thirty-three patients were included and randomly divided into two groups. The test group consisted of 17 patients who received monolithic-LS2 -SIC, while the control group consisted of 16 patients who received veneered-ZrO2 -SIC. Implant/prosthesis survival rates, technical complications, peri-implant soft tissue conditions, and quantitative occlusal changes of SIC (obtained by the intra-oral scanner and analyzed in reverse software Geomagic Control 2015) were assessed at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Bone loss and Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS) were evaluated at a 3-year follow-up.
Results: After a 3-year follow-up period, one patient dropped out of the follow-up. No implant loss was observed. One crown was fractured, resulting in prosthesis survival rates of 93.75% for the monolithic group and 100% for the veneered group. A technical complication rate of 25% (4/16) was observed in the veneered group (p = .333). No significant differences in the marginal bone loss were observed at the 3-year follow-up (0.00 (-0.22, 0.17) mm versus 0.00 (-0.12, 0.12) mm, p = .956). The total FIPS scores for the test group were 9.0 (9.0, 9.0), while the control group received scores of 9.0 (8.0, 10.0) (p = .953). The changes in mean occlusal clearance were 0.022 ± 0.083 mm for the test and 0.034 ± 0.077 mm for the control group (at 3 years, p = .497). The changes in occlusal contact area were 1.075 ± 2.575 mm2 for the test and 1.676 ± 2.551 mm2 for the control group (at 3 years, p = .873).
Conclusion: After a 3-year follow-up, screw-retained monolithic LS2 and veneered ZrO2 SIC demonstrated similar survival rates. The occlusal performance of implant prostheses needs to be closely examined during follow-up, and appropriate occlusal adjustments need to be considered.
Keywords: complications; digital workflow; implant crown; monolithic; occlusal; screw-retained; survival; veneered.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):505-511. doi: 10.1111/cid.12472. Epub 2017 Jan 16. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28093860 Clinical Trial.
-
Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.J Prosthodont. 2024 Mar;33(3):221-230. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13723. Epub 2023 Jul 7. J Prosthodont. 2024. PMID: 37302066
-
Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.016. Epub 2019 Jun 12. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. PMID: 31202552
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13306. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30328190
-
Monolithic zirconia as a valid alternative to metal-ceramic for implant-supported single crowns in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):881-889. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 21. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 37349158
Cited by
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 12;13(2):432. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020432. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256565 Free PMC article.
-
An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 24;28(10):543. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05940-8. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39316184 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dynamic changes in sumoylation related proteins SUMO1, SENP1, and UBC9 during the peri implantation period in mice.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07677-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40593246 Free PMC article.
-
German S3 guideline on implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Aug 13;11(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00641-7. Int J Implant Dent. 2025. PMID: 40802222 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abou-Ayash, S., Strasding, M., Rücker, G., & Att, W. (2017). Impact of prosthetic material on mid- and long-term outcome of dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 10(Suppl 1), 47-65.
-
- Bondevik, O. (1998). Changes in occlusion between 23 and 34 years. The Angle Orthodontist, 68(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0075:Ciobay>2.3.Co;2
-
- Bösch, A., Jung, R. E., Sailer, I., Goran, B., Hämmerle, C. H., & Thoma, D. S. (2018). Single-tooth replacement using dental implants supporting all-ceramic and metal-based reconstructions: Results at 18 months of loading. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 38(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2846
-
- CotruTa, A. M., Mihaescu, C. S., Tanasescu, L. A., Margarit, R., & Andrei, O. C. (2015). Analyzing the morphology and intensity of occlusal contacts in implant-prosthetic restorations using T-scan system. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 56(1), 277-281.
-
- d'Incau, E., Couture, C., & Maureille, B. (2012). Human tooth wear in the past and the present: Tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations. Archives of Oral Biology, 57(3), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.021
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources