Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;18(8):e0284099.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284099. eCollection 2023.

Main topics in assisted reproductive market: A scoping review

Affiliations

Main topics in assisted reproductive market: A scoping review

Janaina Ferreira Aderaldo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects around 12% of couples, and this proportion has been gradually increasing. In this context, the global assisted reproductive technologies (ART) market shows significant expansion, hovering around USD 26 billion in 2019 and is expected to reach USD 45 billion by 2025.

Objectives: We realized a scoping review of the ART market from academic publications, market reports, and specialized media news, to identify the main terms and characterize them into the main topics in the area.

Design: We apply an LDA topic modeling process to identify the main terms, and clustered them into semantic synonymous topics. We extracted the patterns and information to these topics and purposed a factor/consequence correlation to them.

Results: We found 2,232 academic papers and selected 632 to include in the automatic term detection. We also included 34 market reports and seven notices produced by specialized enterprises. Were identified 121 most relevant cited terms covering 7,806 citations. These terms were manually aggregated into 10 topics based on semantic similarity: neutral terms (37.2%), economic aspects (17.6%), in vitro fertilization (IVF) commodities & cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) (10.6%), geographic distribution (9.5%), social aspects (7%), regulation (6%), trends & concerns (3.9%), accessibility (3.4%), internet influence (2.9%), and fertility preservation for non-medical reasons (2%).

Discussion: The analysis indicates a market with expressive complexity. Most terms were associated with more than one topic, indicating the synergism of this market's behavior. Only seven terms related to economic aspects, surrogacy and donation represent around 50% of the citations. Except for the topic formed by generic terms, the topic of the economic aspects was the most represented, reflecting macro perspectives such as a-la-carte standard of treatments, many clinics operating on a small/medium scale, and the recent formation of conglomerates. The IVF commodities & CBRC topic brings an overview of gametes pricing and transnational surrogacy, and its regulation. The topic of geographic distribution indicates that that the Asia-Pacific (APAC) market has the most significant growth potential in all fields. Despite the increase in supply and demand for infertility treatments and technological advances in recent decades, the success rate of IVF cycles remains at around 30%. Terms referring to research and development or technical improvement were not identified in a significant way in this review.

Conclusions: The formation of topics by semantic similarity proved to be an initial path for the elaboration of in-depth studies on the dynamics between several factors, for this, we present the panel classifying main terms into factors (demand, pent-up demand, or distributive) or ART market consequences. Through this approach, it was possible to observe that most of the works addresses economic aspects, regulation and geographic aspects and that topics related to research and improvement have not been addressed. In this way, we highlight the need to deepen the analysis of market elements that may be related to increased efficiency of IVF in the technical field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study design for scoping review research (Prisma-ScR) with a topic modeling approach.
This design was adapted from Page et al. (2020) and purposes to identify the studies in databases and other methods through the query elaborated from the research question. After selecting studies by eligibility criteria, the titles, keywords, and abstracts were subjected to detecting terms using the topic modeling approach [23]. Terms were aggregated by semantic similarity into clusters (topics), summarized, and presented.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flow diagram for scoping review research (Prisma-ScR).
We identified 2,232 academic publications in initial search. After duplicates, and ineligible exclusions (n = 1,600), we included 41 gray literature records. In total, were selected 673 abstracts, titles, and keywords for topic modeling screening step.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Detected terms and clustering.
A) 30 most cited terms detected by the topic modeling automation tool and each number of citations on the database. 26.9% of citations correspond to the neutral term reproductive. This was overestimated for being present in all titles and keywords and repeated in abstracts. Disregarding this term, we identified specific terms such as industry (586 citations) and surrogacy (345 citations); B) 10 Clusters of 121 detected terms aggregated by semantic similarity. We chose to organize the clusters based on the total number of citations (orange bars). The number of topics in each cluster is available in the blue bars.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Location of the main themes of legislative changes within the main topics identified.
The main themes of recent legislative changes stated by the IFFS (2019) coincide with the terms identified by topic modeling. In this way, we identified in which topics the similar terms were inserted and prepared this graph to illustrate the location of the main themes of legislative changes in relation to the main topics in assisted reproduction. Note that each topic may be included in more than one topic due to the complexity of the market.

References

    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GDD, De Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Human Reproduction. 2009;24: 2683–2687. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108: 393–406. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62: 2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations. World Fertility Patterns 2015 Data Booklet. UNESA Publication. 2015; 1–30.
    1. Grand View Research. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (IVF, Others), By End Use (Hospitals, Fertility Clinics), By Procedures And Segment Forecasts, 2018–2025. 2018.

Publication types