Current perspectives on endometrial receptivity: A comprehensive overview of etiology and treatment
- PMID: 37527810
- DOI: 10.1111/jog.15759
Current perspectives on endometrial receptivity: A comprehensive overview of etiology and treatment
Abstract
Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) remains a challenging problem in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Further insights into uterine abnormalities that can disturb embryo implantation should be obtained. This review provides an overview of the effects of organic and non-organic uterine disorders on endometrial receptivity. The results suggest that various uterine pathologies can lead to defective embryo implantation via multiple mechanisms. In particular, uterine adenomyosis dysregulates molecular and cellular interactions that are vital for successful embryo implantation with a background of chronic inflammation, which may be alleviated by pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Uterine myomas can cause endometrial deformation and adverse alterations in uterine contractility. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of myomectomy remains debated, and endometrial polyp removal may be considered, particularly in patients with RIF. Chronic endometritis abrogates the appropriate uterine immunological environment critical for embryo implantation. Abnormal endometrial microbiota have been suggested to influence endometrial receptivity; however, supporting evidence is currently scarce. Platelet-rich plasma therapy may be a potential treatment for thin endometria; nevertheless, further validation is required. Endometrial receptivity analysis can detect dysregulation of the window of implantation, and new non-invasive methods for predicting endometrial receptivity have recently been proposed. However, numerous issues still need to be fully clarified. Further clinical and basic studies are necessary to investigate the pathophysiology of defective endometrial receptivity and identify optimal treatments for patients undergoing ART, especially those with RIF.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; embryo implantation; endometrial receptivity; female infertility; recurrent implantation failure.
© 2023 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Lipid metabolism and endometrial receptivity.Hum Reprod Update. 2022 Nov 2;28(6):858-889. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac026. Hum Reprod Update. 2022. PMID: 35639910 Review.
-
Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity.Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008. Fertil Steril. 2019. PMID: 30929720 Review.
-
Implantation failure of endometrial origin: what is new?Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;30(4):229-236. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000468. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29889670 Review.
-
Recurrent Implantation Failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 5;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018. PMID: 30518389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by endometrial receptivity (ER) assessment - a possibility to increase effectiveness of IVF procedures. Review of available methods.Ginekol Pol. 2023;94(12):1004-1010. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2023.0041. Epub 2023 May 10. Ginekol Pol. 2023. PMID: 37162136
Cited by
-
Assessment of the Role of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis in Enhancing Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes for Advanced-Age Patients.Cureus. 2024 Jun 23;16(6):e62949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62949. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39044886 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Immunome and Microbiome Interplay in Reproductive Health: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Novel Diagnostic Tools.Semin Reprod Med. 2023 Sep;41(5):172-189. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778017. Epub 2024 Jan 23. Semin Reprod Med. 2023. PMID: 38262441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of thin endometrium: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06741-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39215227 Free PMC article.
-
The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91745-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40025209 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Pre-Implantation Uterine Artery Doppler with Clinical Pregnancy in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 28;61(6):1004. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061004. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40572692 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, Bracco B, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:964-977.
-
- Younes G, Tulandi T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:483-490.e3.
-
- Rocha TP, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Abrao MS. Fertility-sparing treatment of adenomyosis in patients with infertility: a systematic review of current options. Reprod Sci. 2018;25:480-486.
-
- Tan J, Moriarty S, Taskin O, Allaire C, Williams C, Yong P, et al. Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for focal and diffuse adenomyosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:608-621.
-
- Younes G, Tulandi T. Conservative surgery for adenomyosis and results: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:265-276.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- JP23gk0210028/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- JP23gk0110056/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- JP23gk0110069/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- JP23lk0310083/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- JP22H02538/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical