Evaluation of the quality of colonoscopies performed by Alberta North Zone surgeons, family physicians and internists: a quality improvement initiative
- PMID: 37527900
- PMCID: PMC10400082
- DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210237
Evaluation of the quality of colonoscopies performed by Alberta North Zone surgeons, family physicians and internists: a quality improvement initiative
Abstract
Background: In Canada, endoscopy is primarily performed by gastroenterologists and surgeons, and some studies report that colonoscopies performed by nongastroenterologists have more complications and higher rates of future colorectal cancer. Our objective was to determine whether rural-based nongastroenterologist endoscopists are achieving quality benchmarks in colonoscopy.
Methods: This quality improvement initiative prospectively evaluated 6 key performance indicators (KPIs) (cecal intubations, polyp detection [males and females; for first-time colonoscopies on patients aged ≥ 50 yr], bowel preparations, patient comfort and withdrawal times) on consecutive colonoscopies performed by participating Alberta North Zone endoscopists. The study period was June 2018 to March 2020. Overall and individual endoscopist's KPIs were compared with standard benchmarks. Additional performance indicators included mean number of polyps per colonoscopy and an exploration of study-defined sedation-related level of consciousness.
Results: Data were collected on 6212 colonoscopies performed by 16 endoscopists (9 surgeons, 5 family physicians and 2 internists) in 6 hospitals. All 6 KPI benchmarks were achieved when results were pooled over all endoscopists in the study. Overall, cecal intubation occurred in 6006 of 6209 (96.7%, 95% confidence interval 94.5%-99.0%) cases. Polyp detection was 65.9% (592/898) and 49.8% (348/699) for male and female patients, respectively, aged 50 years or older. Variability in individual endoscopist results existed, especially for the mean number of polyps per 100 colonoscopies and sedation-related level of consciousness.
Interpretation: Overall, Alberta North Zone endoscopists are performing high-quality colonoscopies, collectively achieving all 6 KPIs. To understand endoscopic performance and encourage individual and group reflection on endoscopic practices, Canadian endoscopists are encouraged to participate in similar colonoscopy quality initiative studies.
© 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Michael Kolber founded EMPRSS, a University of Alberta spin-off company that supported the data collection, synthesis and reporting of results to the participants and their teams. No other competing interests were declared.
Similar articles
-
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 25412094
-
Prospective Study of the Quality of Colonoscopies Performed by Primary Care Physicians: The Alberta Primary Care Endoscopy (APC-Endo) Study.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e67017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067017. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23826186 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies.Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82317. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40376347 Free PMC article.
-
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31188154
-
Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit.Am J Surg. 2022 Mar;223(3):500-502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.032. Epub 2021 Dec 2. Am J Surg. 2022. PMID: 34916039 Review.
Cited by
-
Canadian considerations on updating the age of initiation for colorectal cancer screening in individuals at average risk.Can J Surg. 2025 Aug 8;68(4):E313-E324. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000825. Print 2025 Jul-Aug. Can J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40780872 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources