Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Dec;118(12):2327-2341.
doi: 10.1111/add.16288. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Impact of health warning labels and calorie labels on selection and purchasing of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks: A randomized controlled trial

Natasha Clarke  1   2 , Jennifer Ferrar  3 , Emily Pechey  1 , Minna Ventsel  1 , Mark A Pilling  1 , Marcus R Munafò  3 , Theresa M Marteau  1 , Gareth J Hollands  1   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of health warning labels and calorie labels on selection and purchasing of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks: A randomized controlled trial

Natasha Clarke et al. Addiction. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the impact on selection and actual purchasing of (a) health warning labels (text-only and image-and-text) on alcoholic drinks and (b) calorie labels on alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.

Design: Parallel-groups randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Drinks were selected in a simulated online supermarket, before being purchased in an actual online supermarket.

Participants: Adults in England and Wales who regularly consumed and purchased beer or wine online (n = 651). Six hundred and eight participants completed the study and were included in the primary analysis.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to one of six groups in a between-subjects three [health warning labels (HWLs) (i): image-and-text HWL; (ii) text-only HWL; (iii) no HWL] × 2 (calorie labels: present versus absent) factorial design (n per group 103-113).

Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the number of alcohol units selected (with intention to purchase); secondary outcomes included alcohol units purchased and calories selected and purchased. There was no time limit for selection. For purchasing, participants were directed to purchase their drinks immediately (although they were allowed up to 2 weeks to do so).

Findings: There was no evidence of main effects for either (a) HWLs or (b) calorie labels on the number of alcohol units selected (HWLs: F(2,599) = 0.406, P = 0.666; calorie labels: F(1,599) = 0.002, P = 0.961). There was also no evidence of an interaction between HWLs and calorie labels, and no evidence of an overall difference on any secondary outcomes. In pre-specified subgroup analyses comparing the 'calorie label only' group (n = 101) with the 'no label' group (n = 104) there was no evidence that calorie labels reduced the number of calories selected (unadjusted means: 1913 calories versus 2203, P = 0.643). Among the 75% of participants who went on to purchase drinks, those in the 'calorie label only' group (n = 74) purchased fewer calories than those in the 'no label' group (n = 79) (unadjusted means: 1532 versus 2090, P = 0.028).

Conclusions: There was no evidence that health warning labels reduced the number of alcohol units selected or purchased in an online retail context. There was some evidence suggesting that calorie labels on alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks may reduce calories purchased from both types of drinks.

Keywords: Alcohol; calorie label; choice architecture; health warning label; purchasing; selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow of participants through study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018 World Health Organization; 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (accessed June 2022)
    1. Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi‐Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1223–1249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollands GJ, Bignardi G, Johnston M, Kelly MP, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, et al. The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:0140.
    1. Blackwell AKM, Drax K, Attwood AS, Munafò MR, Maynard OM. Informing drinkers: can current UK alcohol labels be improved? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;192:163–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) . Labelling the point: towards better alcohol health information. 2018. Available at: https://www.rsph.org.uk/our-work/policy/drugs/labelling-the-point.html (accessed June 2022)

Publication types

Associated data