Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes
- PMID: 37529197
- PMCID: PMC10375816
- DOI: 10.4055/cios23018
Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes
Abstract
The shoulder, being the most mobile joint in the human body, is often susceptible to dislocations and subluxations more so than other joints. As such, shoulder instability constitutes a common complaint among patients worldwide, especially those who are young, participate in contact sports, and have increased innate flexibility in their joints. Management options in the setting of instability vary between conservative and surgical options that aim to mitigate symptoms and allow return of function. Surgical options can be arthroscopic and open, with a general shift among surgeons towards utilizing arthroscopic surgery in the past several decades. Nevertheless, open procedures still play a role in managing shoulder instability patients, especially those with significant bone loss, recurrent instability, coexisting shoulder pathologies, and high risk of failure with arthroscopic surgery. In these clinical settings, open procedures, like the Latarjet procedure, open Bankart repair, glenoid bone augmentation using iliac crest autograft or distal tibial allograft, and salvage options like glenohumeral arthrodesis and arthroplasty may show good clinical outcomes and low recurrence rates. Each of these open procedures possesses its own set of advantages and disadvantages and entails a specific set of indications based on published literature. It is important to cater treatment options to the individual patient in order to optimize outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. Future research on open shoulder stabilization procedures should focus on the long-term outcomes of recently utilized procedures, investigate different graft options for procedures involving bone augmentation, and conduct additional comparative analyses in order to establish concrete surgical management guidelines.
Keywords: Bankart lesions; Contact athlete; Glenoid bone loss; Labrum; Latarjet.
Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: JAA would like to disclose royalties from DJO Global, Zimmer-Biomet, Smith and Nephew, Stryker, Globus Medical, INC.; research support as a PI from Lima Corporation-Italy, Orthofix, Arthrex, OREF; royalties, financial or material support from Wolters Kluwer; and Board Member/Committee appointments for American Shoulder and Elbow Society, Pacira.
Figures
References
-
- Chang LR, Anand P, Varacallo M. Anatomy, shoulder and upper limb, glenohumeral joint [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30725703/ - PubMed
-
- Wilk KE, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. Current concepts: the stabilizing structures of the glenohumeral joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(6):364–379. - PubMed
-
- Halder AM, Halder CG, Zhao KD, O’Driscoll SW, Morrey BF, An KN. Dynamic inferior stabilizers of the shoulder joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001;16(2):138–143. - PubMed
-
- Halder AM, Zhao KD, Odriscoll SW, Morrey BF, An KN. Dynamic contributions to superior shoulder stability. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(2):206–212. - PubMed
-
- Balvanyossy P. Static stabilizers of the shoulder joint. Unfallchirurg. 1990;93(1):27–31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
