Patterns and Predictors of Abortion Care-Seeking Practices in India: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey (2019-2021)
- PMID: 37529821
- PMCID: PMC10390032
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41263
Patterns and Predictors of Abortion Care-Seeking Practices in India: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey (2019-2021)
Abstract
Background India continues to have unsafe abortions despite progressive legislation since the past five decades facilitating ease of access to abortion services. This study describes abortion care-seeking patterns (social/therapeutic/humanitarian/sex-selective/safe/unsafe), preferences (public/private/at home), and their determinants among Indian women. Methods Data were taken from the Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) including women aged 15-49 years, who had terminated their last pregnancy by induced abortion within five years prior to the survey (N = 5,856). A bivariate analysis, followed by a multinomial logistic regression model, was performed to assess the predictors affecting the choice of healthcare facility type for an abortion. Predictors of unsafe and self-managed abortions were examined using binary logistic regression. Results About 665,671 women in the reproductive age group responded to the survey, of which 3.42% (n=22,767) reported their most recent pregnancy within the last five years terminated in either a miscarriage, stillbirth or abortion, of which 5,856 (25.72%) underwent an induced abortion. Women undergoing surgical abortion were more likely to avail of either a public (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR)=38.06 (23.62, 61.35)) or a private facility (aRRR=44.53 (28.11,70.53)) compared to at-home abortions. Women reporting a social and humanitarian reason for abortion were less likely to undergo an abortion at a public (aRRR=0.25 (0.17,0.35)) or private facility (aRRR=0.32 (0.23,0.44)) than at home. Furthermore, a total of 147 (2.43%) abortions were classified as unsafe. Women reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion were observed to have a higher likelihood of engaging in an unsafe abortion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 1.61 (0.70, 3.70)) compared to those citing a therapeutic reason. Conclusions Self-managed abortions at home were more prevalent in women of lower socioeconomic status, adolescent girls, and those reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion. Furthermore, the reproductive-health program in India should enhance capacity-building initiatives for primary-care healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, to effectively prescribe and supervise abortion through medication methods.
Keywords: abortion; health services; maternal health; maternal mortality; nfhs-5; reproductive health.
Copyright © 2023, Malik et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Abortion care seeking in India: patterns and predictors.J Biosoc Sci. 2020 May;52(3):353-365. doi: 10.1017/S002193201900049X. Epub 2019 Sep 10. J Biosoc Sci. 2020. PMID: 31500676
-
Prevalence and factors associated with abortion and unsafe abortion in Nepal: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2011-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30223798 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion service provision in South Asia: A comparative study of four countries.Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 29. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32479764
-
Why do women abort their pregnancies? Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2019-21) of India.J Biosoc Sci. 2023 May 17:1-16. doi: 10.1017/S0021932023000081. Online ahead of print. J Biosoc Sci. 2023. PMID: 37194645
-
The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015.Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30453-9. Lancet Glob Health. 2018. PMID: 29241602 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965. eCollection 2024. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39636911 Free PMC article.
-
Reflections on my international genetic counseling rotations: Contrasts in practice between India and the United States.Genet Med Open. 2024 Jul 20;2(Suppl 2):101871. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101871. eCollection 2024. Genet Med Open. 2024. PMID: 39712964 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Safe Abortion care guideline. Abortion care guideline. [ May; 2023 ]. 2022. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240039483 https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240039483
-
- Ghosh J. Women’s rights to abortion in India: critical analysis . [ May; 2023 ]. 2020. https://www.jlsrjournal.in/womens-rights-to-abortion-in-india-critical-a... https://www.jlsrjournal.in/womens-rights-to-abortion-in-india-critical-a...
-
- HRP Annual Report 2016. Vol. 10. World Health Organisation; [ May; 2023 ]. 2017. HRP annual report 2016; p. 2023.
-
- Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:1152–1161. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous