Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15080.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.15080. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sang-Hoon Kim et al. Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs).

Methods: Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model.

Results: One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay.

Conclusions: Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.

Keywords: donor safety; living donor; living donor liver transplantation; morbidity; remnant volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Goldaracena N, Gorgen A, Doyle A, et al. Live donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma offers increased survival vs. deceased donation. J Hepatol. 2019;70:666-673.
    1. Mittler J, Pascher A, Jonas S, et al. Adult living donor liver transplantation: living donation of the right liver lobe. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2007;392:657-662.
    1. Marcos A. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a review. Liver Transplant. 2000;6:3-20.
    1. Feng Y, Han Z, Wang X, et al. Association of graft-to-recipient weight ratio with the prognosis following liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1869-1879.
    1. Taner CB, Dayangac M, Akin B, et al. Donor safety and remnant liver volume in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2008;14:1174-1179.

LinkOut - more resources