Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Aug;71(8):2967-2971.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3385_22.

Refractive outcomes of toric intra-ocular lens implantation in cases of high posterior corneal astigmatism

Affiliations
Comment

Refractive outcomes of toric intra-ocular lens implantation in cases of high posterior corneal astigmatism

Tianru Jin et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the toric intra-ocular lens (IOL) power calculation based on total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in eyes with high posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) could result in a systematic over-correction or under-correction after operation.

Methods: The present study included a mono-centric retrospective study design. The data were collected from 62 consecutive eyes during uncomplicated cataract surgery by a single surgeon with a measured PCA of 0.50 diopters (D) or higher. Toric IOL calculations were made using TCA measurements. The eyes were grouped as either "with-the-rule" (WTR) or "against-the-rule" (ATR) on the basis of the steep anterior corneal meridian. The post-operative refractive astigmatic prediction error was analyzed 1 month post-operatively using the vector analysis by the Alpins method and double-angle plots method.

Results: The correction indexes were 1.14 ± 0.29 in the ATR eyes and 1.25 ± 0.18 for the WTR eyes, indicating a tendency toward over-correction. The mean over-correction was 0.22 ± 0.52D in the ATR group and 0.65 ± 0.60D in the WTR group. The magnitude of error (ME) values were significantly different from the ideal value of zero in both groups (ATR: P = 0.03; WTR: P = 0.00). No significant difference in mean absolute error (MAE) in predicted residual astigmatism was found between ATR and WTR groups (0.61 ± 0.42 D versus 0.64 ± 0.39 D; P = 0.54). The ATR group yielded better results, with 48% <0.50D prediction error in the main analysis.

Conclusions: The results suggested that in cases of high PCA, the toric IOL calculation, which was performed using TCA, may cause a potential over-correction in the ATR and WTR eyes. For ATR eyes, over-correction led to slight disruption of post-operative visual quality because of the "with-the-rule" residual astigmatism after operation. Therefore, we suggested using TCA for toric IOL calculation in ATR eyes.

Keywords: Posterior corneal astigmatism; refractive surgery; toric IOL; total corneal astigmatism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Comment on

  • Age-Related Changes in Corneal Astigmatism.
    Shao X, Zhou KJ, Pan AP, Cheng XY, Cai HX, Huang JH, Yu AY. Shao X, et al. J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):696-703. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170718-04. J Refract Surg. 2017. PMID: 28991338

References

    1. Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-MicóR, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Su J, Luo L, Congdon N, et al. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:70–5. - PubMed
    1. Kessel L, Andresen J, Tendal B, Erngaard D, Flesner P, Hjortdal J, et al. Toric intraocular lenses in the correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:275–86. - PubMed
    1. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2080–7. - PubMed
    1. Shao X, Zhou KJ, Pan AP, Cheng XY, Cai HX, Huang JH, et al. Age-related changes in corneal astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:696–703. - PubMed
    1. Zhai J. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2015. Theories and Methods of Optometry; pp. 88–9.