Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;14(6):102231.
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102231. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

Acceptability of 4-poster deer treatment devices for community-wide tick control among residents of high Lyme disease incidence counties in Connecticut and New York, USA

Courtney C Nawrocki  1 , Nicholas Piedmonte  2 , Sara A Niesobecki  3 , Adam Rowe  2 , AmberJean P Hansen  3 , Alison Kaufman  2 , Erik Foster  4 , James I Meek  3 , Linda Niccolai  3 , Jennifer White  2 , Bryon Backenson  2 , Lars Eisen  4 , Sarah A Hook  4 , Neeta P Connally  5 , Victoria L Hornbostel  5 , Alison F Hinckley  4
Affiliations

Acceptability of 4-poster deer treatment devices for community-wide tick control among residents of high Lyme disease incidence counties in Connecticut and New York, USA

Courtney C Nawrocki et al. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

The 4-Poster Tick Control Deer Feeder (4-poster) device applies acaricide to white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and can reduce populations of the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), which transmits the agents of Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and Powassan virus disease in the Northeastern United States. While 4-poster devices have the potential to provide community-wide management of blacklegged ticks in Lyme disease endemic areas, no recent study has assessed their acceptability among residents. We conducted a survey of residents from 16 counties with high annual average Lyme disease incidence (≥ 10 cases per 100,000 persons between 2013 and 2017) in Connecticut and New York to understand perceptions and experiences related to tickborne diseases, support or concerns for placement of 4-poster devices in their community, and opinions on which entities should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Overall, 37% of 1652 respondents (5.5% response rate) would support placement of a 4-poster device on their own property, 71% would support placement on other private land in their community, and 90% would support placement on public land. Respondents who were male, rented their property, resided on larger properties, or were very or extremely concerned about encountering ticks on their property were each more likely to support placement of 4-poster devices on their own property. The primary reason for not supporting placement of a 4-poster device on one's own property was the need for weekly service visits from pest control professionals, whereas the top reason for not supporting placement on other land (private or public) was safety concerns. Most respondents (61%) felt property owners should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Communities considering 4-poster devices as part of a tick management strategy should consider targeting owners of larger properties and placing devices on public lands.

Keywords: Humans; Lyme disease; Prevention; Tick-borne disease; Ticks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Respondent opinion on who should be responsible for tick control on private properties, Connecticut and New York, USA, 2021. *Denotes statistically significant differences between states. **Multiple answers were allowed; totals may exceed 100%.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beck A, Bjork J, Biggerstaff BJ, Eisen L, Eisen R, Foster E, Signs K, Tsao JI, Kough E, Peterson M, Schiffman E, Muganda CP, Osborn R, Wozniak R, Bron GM, Phaneuf D, Smith D, Bartholomay L, Paskewitz S, Hinckley AF, 2022. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding tick-borne disease prevention in Lyme disease-endemic areas of the Upper Midwest, United States. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 13, 101925. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brei B, Brownstein JS, George JE, Pound JM, Miller JA, Daniels TJ, Falco C, Stafford KC, Schulze TL, Mather TN, Carroll JF, Fish D, 2009. Evaluation of the United States department of agriculture northeast area-wide tick control project by meta-analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 9, 423–430. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connally NP, Rowe A, Kaufman A, Meek JI, Niesobecki SA, Hansen AP, White J, Nawrocki C, Foster E, Hinckley AF, Eisen L, 2022. Designing an intervention trial of human-tick encounters and tick-borne diseases in residential settings using 4-poster devices to control Ixodes scapularis (Acari: ixodidae): challenges for site selection and device placement. J. Med. Entomol 59, 911–921. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis PD, Walker SM, Gilrein DO, 2011. Shelter Island and Fire Island 4-Poster Deer and Tick Study: Final Report. Cornell University & Cornell Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, NY.
    1. Curtis PD, Walker SM, Gilrein DO, Boulanger JR, 2009. A preliminary evaluation of deer behavior and nontarget animal use associated with the 4-Poster tickicide device on Long Island, New York. In: Proceedings of the 13th Wildlife Damage Management Conference.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources