Similar articles

• Quality assurance in The Netherlands: Part 1. An evaluation of the CBO peer review experience in hospital care.

  Williamson JW, Greenfield S, van Andel H, Torr S. Williamson JW, et al. Aust Clin Rev. 1985 Dec;5(19):160-7. Aust Clin Rev. 1985. PMID: 3833164 No abstract available.
• Improving the quality of hospital services in The Netherlands. The role of CBO--The National Organization for Quality Assurance in The Netherlands.

  Reerink E. Reerink E. Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(1):13-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.1.13. Qual Assur Health Care. 1990. PMID: 2103868
• Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review.

  Thompson RE. Thompson RE. Med Staff Couns. 1988 Fall;2(4):39-49. Med Staff Couns. 1988. PMID: 10290183
• Quality management in medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands.

  Klazinga N, Lombarts K, van Everdingen J. Klazinga N, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 May;24(5):240-50. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30378-9. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998. PMID: 9626617 Review.
• [Consensus about consensus. A critical consideration of the procedure of the CBO-consensus development (Central Support Organ for Peer Review)].

  Grol RP, van Everdingen JJ, Kuipers F, Casparie AF. Grol RP, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Jun 16;134(24):1186-9. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990. PMID: 2195362 Review. Dutch. No abstract available.