Danish 20-month-olds' recognition of familiar words with and without consonant and vowel mispronunciations
- PMID: 37533184
- DOI: 10.1515/phon-2023-2001
Danish 20-month-olds' recognition of familiar words with and without consonant and vowel mispronunciations
Abstract
Although several studies initially supported the proposal by Nespor et al. (Nespor, Marina, Marcela Peña & Jacques Mehler. 2003. On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2. 221-247) that consonants are more informative than vowels in lexical processing, a more complex picture has emerged from recent research. Current evidence suggests that infants initially show a vowel bias in lexical processing and later transition to a consonant bias, possibly depending on the characteristics of the ambient language. Danish infants have shown a vowel bias in word learning at 20 months-an age at which infants learning French or Italian no longer show a vowel bias but rather a consonant bias, and infants learning English show no bias. The present study tested whether Danish 20-month-olds also have a vowel bias when recognizing familiar words. Specifically, using the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm, we tested whether Danish infants were more likely to ignore or accept consonant than vowel mispronunciations when matching familiar words with pictures. The infants successfully matched correctly pronounced familiar words with pictures but showed no vowel or consonant bias when matching mispronounced words with pictures. The lack of a bias for Danish vowels or consonants in familiar word recognition adds to evidence that lexical processing biases are language-specific and may additionally depend on developmental age and perhaps task difficulty.
Keywords: Danish; infant speech perception; language acquisition; lexical processing; processing bias.
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Acha, Joana & Manuel Perea. 2010. On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing: Evidence with a letter search paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(3). 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903411666 . - DOI
-
- Bailey, Todd M. & Kim Plunkett. 2002. Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development 17(2). 1265–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2014(02)00116-8 . - DOI
-
- Ballem, Kate D. & Kim Plunkett. 2005. Phonological specificity in children at 1;2. Journal of Child Language 32(1). 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000904006567 . - DOI
-
- Benavides-Varela, Silvia, Jean-Rémy Hochmann, Francesco Macagno, Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler. 2012. Newborn’s brain activity signals the origin of word memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(44). 17908–17913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205413109 . - DOI
-
- Bleses, Dorthe, Werner Vach, Malene Slott, Sonja Wehberg, Pia Thomsen, Thomas O. Madsen & Hans Basbøll. 2008. The Danish communicative developmental inventories: Validity and main developmental trends. Journal of Child Language 35(3). 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008574 . - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources