Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 31;11(7):23259671231186972.
doi: 10.1177/23259671231186972. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Failure Rates and Complications After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of the Over-the-Top and Transportal Drilling Techniques

Emre Anil Özbek  1   2 , Philipp W Winkler  3   4 , Ehab M Nazzal  1 , Bálint Zsidai  1   5 , Nicholas P Drain  1 , Janina Kaarre  1   5 , Andrew Sprague  6 , Bryson P Lesniak  1 , Volker Musahl  1
Affiliations

Failure Rates and Complications After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of the Over-the-Top and Transportal Drilling Techniques

Emre Anil Özbek et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) presents several technical challenges, often due to residual hardware, tunnel widening, malposition, or staged surgeries.

Purpose: To compare failure and complication rates between the over-the-top (OTT) and transportal drilling (TD) techniques in patients undergoing surgery for failed revision ACLR.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The medical records of patients with at least 2 revision ACLRs using either the OTT or TD technique were reviewed retrospectively. Data on patient demographics, graft characteristics, number of revisions, concomitant procedures, complications, and failures were collected. Between-group comparisons of continuous and categorical variables were conducted with the independent-samples t test and the Fisher exact or chi-square test, respectively.

Results: A total of 101 patients undergoing multiple-revision ACLR with OTT (n = 37, 37%) and TD (n = 64, 63%) techniques were included for analysis. The mean follow-up time was 60 months (range, 12-196 months). There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, laterality, or follow-up length between groups (P > .05). Allograft was the graft used most frequently (n = 64; 67.3%) with no significant differences between groups in graft diameter (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding rate of concurrent medial and lateral meniscus, cartilage, or lateral extra-articular procedures (P > .05). There was also no significant66 between-group difference in complication rate (OTT: n = 2 [5.4%]; TD: n = 8 [13%]) or graft failure rate (OTT: n = 4 [11%]; TD: n = 14 [22%]) (P > .05 for both).

Conclusion: The results of this study showed notably high failure and complication rates in challenging multiple-revision ACLR. Complication and failure rates were similar between techniques, demonstrating that the OTT technique is a valuable alternative that can be used in a revision ACLR, particularly as a single-stage approach when the single-stage TD technique is not possible.

Keywords: ACLR; OTT; graft failure; multiple-revision; over-the-top-technique; revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: E.A.O. was awarded a grant by ESSKA-University of Pittsburgh Sports Medicine Clinical and Research Fellowship, and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) outside the submitted work. B.P.L. has received education payments from Mid-Atlantic Surgical and royalties from Wolters Kluwer Health-Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. V.M. has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew, nonconsulting fees from Arthrex, and royalties from Springer. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
STROBE flowchart. ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; OTT, over-the-top; STROBE, strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; TD, transportal drilling.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asai S, Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, et al. A comparison of dynamic rotational knee instability between anatomic single-bundle and over-the-top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(5):972–978. - PubMed
    1. Benedetto Di P, Benedetto Di E, Fiocchi A, Beltrame A, Causero A. Causes of failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and revision surgical strategies. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28(4):319–324. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buda R, Ruffilli A, di Caprio F, et al. Allograft salvage procedure in multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):402–410. - PubMed
    1. Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, et al. Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1571–1578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engler ID, Salzler MJ, Wall AJ, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after multiple-revision ACL reconstruction: good but not great. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020;2(5):e539–e546. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources