Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;13(33):23147-23157.
doi: 10.1039/d2ra07944e. eCollection 2023 Jul 26.

Formic and acetic acid p Ka values increase under nanoconfinement

Affiliations

Formic and acetic acid p Ka values increase under nanoconfinement

Izaac Sit et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Organic acids are prevalent in the environment and their acidity and the corresponding dissociation constants can change under varying environmental conditions. The impact of nanoconfinement (when acids are confined within nanometer-scale domains) on physicochemical properties of chemical species is poorly understood and is an emerging field of study. By combining infrared and Raman spectroscopies with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we quantified the effect of nanoconfinement in silica nanopores on one of the fundamental chemical reactions-the dissociation of organic acids. The pKa of formic and acetic acids confined within cylindrical silica nanopores with 4 nm diameters were measured. MD models were constructed to calculate the shifts in the pKa values of acetic acid nanoconfined within 1, 2, 3, and 4 nm silica slit pores. Both experiments and MD models indicate a decrease in the apparent acid dissociation constants (i.e., increase in the pKa values) when organic acids are nanoconfined. Therefore, nanoconfinement stabilizes the protonated species. We attribute this observation to (1) a decrease in the average dielectric response of nanoconfined aqueous solutions where charge screening may be decreased; or (2) an increase in proton concentration inside nanopores, which would shift the equilibrium towards the protonated form. Overall, the results of this study provide the first quantification of the pKa values for nanoconfined formic and acetic acids and pave the way for a unifying theory predicting the impact of nanoconfinement on acid-base chemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Computational simulation cell (left) containing a nanoconfined, 2D slit pore connected to a bulk solvent reservoir. The transformation of acetic acid to acetate is explored in both nanoconfined (left, top) and in bulk (right, bottom) environments. The presence of the two interconverting species in the nanoconfined and bulk regions here is for demonstrational purposes only. Computational simulations were performed with a single molecule in each region; see the Methods section for further clarification.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of bulk and nanoconfined solutions (a) formic acid solutions, (b) acetic acid solutions, (c) nanoconfined formic acid solutions, and (d) nanoconfined acetic acid solutions.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Experimentally determined speciation curves for (a), (b) formic and (c), (d) acetic acid. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) intensities at 1551 cm−1 for the protonated forms, and 1710 cm−1 for de-protonated forms are plotted as a function of pH. Each data point in an average of three measurements; experimental measurement uncertainty is within the size of the symbols.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Raman spectra of bulk and nanoconfined solutions (a) formic acid solutions, (b) acetic acid solutions, (c) nanoconfined formic acid solutions, and (d) nanoconfined acetic acid solutions.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Experimentally determined speciation curves for (a) bulk formic acid, (b) bulk acetic acid, (c) nanoconfined formic acid, and (d) nanoconfined acetic acid. Measurement uncertainty is within the size of the symbols for the (a) and (b) plots.

References

    1. Qiao C. Yu X. Song X. Zhao T. Xu X. Zhao S. Gubbins K. E. Langmuir. 2020;36:8527–8536. - PubMed
    1. Knight A. W. Ilani-Kashkouli P. Harvey J. A. Greathouse J. A. Ho T. A. Kabengi N. Ilgen A. G. Environ. Sci.: Nano. 2020;7:68–80.
    1. Ilgen A. G. Kabengi N. Leung K. Ilani-Kashkouli P. Knight A. W. Loera L. Environ. Sci.: Nano. 2021;8:432–443.
    1. Ferreira D. R. Schulthess C. P. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2011;75:389–396.
    1. Brilmayer R. Kübelbeck S. Khalil A. Brodrecht M. Kunz U. Kleebe H.-J. Buntkowsky G. Baier G. Andrieu-Brunsen A. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;7:1901914.