Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 18:17:1177283.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1177283. eCollection 2023.

Current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for ischemic stroke

Affiliations
Review

Current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for ischemic stroke

Li Zhou et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain neurostimulation technique that can be used as one of the adjunctive treatment techniques for neurological recovery after stroke. Animal studies have shown that TMS treatment of rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model reduced cerebral infarct volume and improved neurological dysfunction in model rats. In addition, clinical case reports have also shown that TMS treatment has positive neuroprotective effects in stroke patients, improving a variety of post-stroke neurological deficits such as motor function, swallowing, cognitive function, speech function, central post-stroke pain, spasticity, and other post-stroke sequelae. However, even though numerous studies have shown a neuroprotective effect of TMS in stroke patients, its possible neuroprotective mechanism is not clear. Therefore, in this review, we describe the potential mechanisms of TMS to improve neurological function in terms of neurogenesis, angiogenesis, anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and anti-apoptosis, and provide insight into the current clinical application of TMS in multiple neurological dysfunctions in stroke. Finally, some of the current challenges faced by TMS are summarized and some suggestions for its future research directions are made.

Keywords: challenges; clinical applications; ischemic stroke; literature search and methods; transcranial magnetic stimulation; underlying mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of literature search.

References

    1. Abo M., Kakuda W., Watanabe M., Morooka A., Kawakami K., Senoo A. (2012). Effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS and intensive speech therapy in poststroke patients with aphasia: a pilot study based on evaluation by fMRI in relation to type of aphasia. Eur. Neurol. 68, 199–208. doi: 10.1159/000338773, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albuquerque F. C. (2014). Bridging treatment and stroke. World Neurosurg. 82, e413–e414. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.086, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aloizou A. M., Pateraki G., Anargyros K., Siokas V., Bakirtzis C., Liampas I., et al. . (2021). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS in multiple sclerosis. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 723–736. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2020-0140 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai N., Okabe S., Furubayashi T., Mochizuki H., Iwata N. K., Hanajima R., et al. . (2007). Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 2227–2233. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.006, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai N., Okabe S., Furubayashi T., Terao Y., Yuasa K., Ugawa Y. (2005). Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.020, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources