Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 30:10:23743735231188826.
doi: 10.1177/23743735231188826. eCollection 2023.

Advance Care Planning and Place of Death During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of Routinely Collected Data

Affiliations

Advance Care Planning and Place of Death During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of Routinely Collected Data

Philippa McFarlane et al. J Patient Exp. .

Abstract

Increased advance care planning was endorsed at the start of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with the aim of optimizing end-of-life care. This retrospective observational cohort study explores the impact of advanced care planning on place of death. 21,962 records from patients who died during the first year of the pandemic and who had an Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System record were included. 11,913 (54%) had a documented place of death. Of these 5,339 died at home and 2,378 died in hospital. 9,971 (45%) had both a documented place of death and a preferred place of death. Of these, 7,668 (77%) died in their preferred location. Documented elements of advance care planning, such as resuscitation status and ceiling of treatment decisions, were associated with an increased likelihood of dying in the preferred location, as were the number of times the record was viewed. During the COVID-19 pandemic, advanced care planning and the use of digital care coordination systems presented an opportunity for patients and healthcare staff to personalize care and influence end-of-life experiences.

Keywords: COVID-19; DNACPR; advance care planning; ceiling of treatment; communication; electronic palliative care coordination system; end-of-life; palliative care; place of death.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Forest plot of odds ratios from forced Logistic Regression modeling on the determinants of dying in the preferred place of death. (B) Forest plot of odds ratios from forced logistic regression modeling on the determinants of dying in hospital. Full results including p values are presented in Appendix III.

References

    1. Rietjens JA, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European association for palliative care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e543–51. - PubMed
    1. Curtis JR, Kross EK, Stapleton RD. The importance of addressing advance care planning and decisions about do-not-resuscitate orders during novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA. 2020;323(18):1771–2. - PubMed
    1. Bellamy G, Stock J, Schofield P. Acceptability of paper-based advance care planning (ACP) to inform end-of-life care provision for community dwelling older adults: A qualitative interview study. Geriatrics. 2018;3(4):88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Board CiEoLP. What's important to me: a review of choice in end of life care. Choice in End of Life Programme Boar; 2015.
    1. Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of End-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1133–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources