Observational learning of atypical biological kinematics in autism
- PMID: 37534381
- DOI: 10.1002/aur.3002
Observational learning of atypical biological kinematics in autism
Abstract
Observing and voluntarily imitating the biological kinematics displayed by a model underpins the acquisition of new motor skills via sensorimotor processes linking perception with action. Differences in voluntary imitation in autism could be related to sensorimotor processing activity during action-observation of biological motion, as well as how sensorimotor integration processing occurs across imitation attempts. Using an observational practice protocol, which minimized the active contribution of the peripheral sensorimotor system, we examined the contribution of sensorimotor processing during action-observation. The data showed that autistic participants imitated both the temporal duration and atypical kinematic profile of the observed movement with a similar level of accuracy as neurotypical participants. These findings suggest the lower-level perception-action processes responsible for encoding biological kinematics during the action-observation phase of imitation are operational in autism. As there was no task-specific engagement of the peripheral sensorimotor system during observational practice, imitation difficulties in autism are most likely underpinned by sensorimotor integration issues related to the processing of efferent and (re)afferent sensorimotor information during trial-to-trial motor execution.
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; biological motion kinematics; imitation; observational practice; sensorimotor integration.
© 2023 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Andrew, M., Bennett, S. J., Elliott, D., & Hayes, S. J. (2016). Complimentary lower-level and higher-order systems underpin imitation learning. Brain and Cognition, 104, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.02.001
-
- Anisfeld, M. (2005). No compelling evidence to dispute Piaget's timetable of the development of representational imitation in infancy. In S. L. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. MIT Press.
-
- Bastiaansen, J. A., Thioux, M., Nanetti, L., van der Gaag, C., Ketelaars, C., Minderaa, R., & Keysers, C. (2011). Age-related increase in inferior frontal gyrus activity and social functioning in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 69(9), 832-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.11.007
-
- Becchio, C., Koul, A., Ansuini, C., Bertone, C., & Cavallo, A. (2018). Seeing mental states: An experimental strategy for measuring the observability of other minds. Physics of Life Reviews, 24, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.10.002
-
- Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(1), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755872
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials