Feasibility of vertical force-velocity profiles to monitor changes in muscle function following different fatigue protocols
- PMID: 37535143
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05283-4
Feasibility of vertical force-velocity profiles to monitor changes in muscle function following different fatigue protocols
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the feasibility of vertical force-velocity (F-V) profiles to monitor changes in muscle function following different fatigue protocols. The between-day reliability of vertical F-V profiles and the acute effects of two fatigue protocols on the changes of lower limb muscle function were examined.
Methods: Twelve resistance trained males completed a preliminary session to determine their back squat one-repetition maximum (1RM). Afterwards, they randomly performed two experimental sessions that only differed in the fatigue protocol applied: heavy-load traditional (HLT; five repetitions at 80% 1RM) and light-load ballistic (LLB; five repetitions at 30% 1RM) squat protocols. Participants' vertical F-V profiles (maximum theoretical force [F0], maximum theoretical velocity [v0], and maximum power output [Pmax]) were calculated before and immediately after each fatigue protocol.
Results: F0, v0, and Pmax showed acceptable to good between-day reliability (coefficient of variation ≤ 4.4%; intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.84). Both fatigue protocols promoted a comparable reduction in Pmax (-10.1% for HLT and -12.2% for LLB). However, the LLB squat protocol reduced more v0 (-9.7%) than F0 (-0.4%), while the HLT squat protocol reduced F0 (-8.4%) more than v0 (-4.1%).
Conclusions: The vertical F-V profile can be used to monitor changes in muscle function given its acceptable between-day reliability and its high sensitivity to detect the acute effect of force-oriented and velocity-oriented fatigue protocols on specific maximal neuromuscular capacities.
Keywords: Force–velocity relationship; Muscle function; Resistance training; Squat.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Bobbert MF (2012) Why is the force-velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic? J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, MD: 1985) 112(12):1975–1983. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00787.2011 - DOI
-
- Cormie P, McCaulley GO, McBride JM (2007) Power versus strength-power jump squat training: influence on the load–power relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(6):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1097/mss.0b013e3180408e0c - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cunanan AJ, DeWeese BH, Wagle JP, Carroll KM, Sausaman R, Hornsby WG, Haff GG, Triplett NT, Pierce KC, Stone MH (2018) The general adaptation syndrome: a foundation for the concept of periodization. Sports Med 48(4):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40279-017-0855-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- De Ruiter CJ, De Haan A (2001) Similar effects of cooling and fatigue on eccentric and concentric force-velocity relationships in human muscle. J Appl Physiol 90(6):2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.1152/JAPPL.2001.90.6.2109/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/DG061070... - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deschenes MR, Kraemer WJ (2002) Performance and physiologic adaptations to resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81(Supplement):S3–S16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200211001-00003 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
