Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;27(9):5637-5647.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05185-x. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery

Affiliations

Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery

Adrian Franke et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Symmetry is essential for computer-aided surgical (CAS) procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). A critical step for successful CAS is mirroring the unaffected side to create a template for the virtual reconstruction of the injured anatomical structure. The aim was to identify specific anatomical landmarks of the midfacial skeleton, to evaluate the symmetry in a group of the real-world Central European population, and to use these landmarks to assess midfacial symmetry in CT scans.

Material and methods: The retrospective cross-sectional study defined landmarks of the midface's bony contour using viscerocranial CT data. The distances of the skeletal landmarks (e.g., the frontozygomatic suture and temporozygomatic suture) of the left and right sides from the midline were measured and statistically compared. Midfacial symmetry for reference points was defined as a difference within 0 mm and their mean difference plus one standard deviation.

Results: We examined a total of 101 CT scans. 75% of our population shows symmetrical proportions of the midface. The means of the differences for the left and right sides ranged from 0.8 to 1.3 mm, averaging 1.1 ± 0.2 mm for all skeletal landmarks. The standard deviations ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 mm, with a computed mean of 0.9 ± 0.3 mm.

Conclusion: We established a methodology to assess the symmetry of the bony midface. If the determined differences were equal to or lower than 2.5 mm in the mentioned midfacial skeletal landmarks, then the symmetry of the bony midface was considered present, and symmetry-based methods for CAS procedures are applicable.

Clinical relevance: Many CAS procedures require facial symmetry. We provide an easy-to-apply method to probe for symmetry of the midface. The method may be used for population-based research, to check for proper reduction of fractures after reposition or to screen for symmetry prior to CAS planning.

Keywords: Computer tomography; Maxillofacial; Midface; Patient-specific implant; Symmetry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example-planes for the definition of the median plane in CT-scan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distance measurement in the transverse direction. Left: frontozygomatic suture, right: temporozygomatic suture
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distance measurement in the transverse direction. Left: infraorbital canal, right: crista lacrimalis posterior
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distance measurement in the transverse direction. Left: lateral orbita, right: medial orbita

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsikandilakis M, Bali P, Chapman P. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: the appraisal of facial attractiveness and its relation to conscious awareness. Perception. 2019;48(1):72–92. doi: 10.1177/0301006618813035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerkfeld V, Schorn L, Depprich R, Lommen J, Wilkat M, Kübler N, et al. Simultaneous PSI-based orthognathic and PEEK bone augmentation surgery leads to improved symmetric facial appearance in craniofacial malformations. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1653. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101653. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayo W, Mohamad AH, Zazo H, Zazo A, Alhashemi M, Meslmany A, et al. Facial defects reconstruction by titanium mesh bending using 3D printing technology: a report of two cases. Ann Med Surg [Internet]. 2022 Jun [cited 2023 Jun 8];78. Available from: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103837 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rana M, Singh B, Gellrich NC. Einsatz von im Laserschmelzverfahren hergestellten patientenspezifischen Implantaten in der Mund- Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie. OP-J. 2017;32(03):241–246. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-123202. - DOI
    1. Wilde F, Schramm A. Computerassistierte Gesichtsschädelrekonstruktion: Planung und Umsetzung in der klinischen Routine. HNO. 2016;64(9):641–649. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0220-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources