"I Just Want to Feel Good Without Making You Feel Bad": Sexual Assertiveness Negotiation in Adolescent Romantic Relationships
- PMID: 37535265
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02668-6
"I Just Want to Feel Good Without Making You Feel Bad": Sexual Assertiveness Negotiation in Adolescent Romantic Relationships
Abstract
Sexual assertiveness is often conceptualized as an individual's ability to express one's own sexual needs, desires, and limits. Given that sexual assertiveness is embedded in interactions and can affect not only both partners' sexual well-being but also relationship satisfaction, dyadic approaches are needed to investigate sexual assertiveness negotiation within adolescent romantic relationships. This qualitative study aimed to document adolescents' ability to negotiate their sexual needs, desires, and limits with their partners during interactions where they discussed their sexual concerns. A directed content analysis, based on the life positions of the transactional analysis theory, was conducted on the interactions of 40 adolescent romantic dyads aged 14-19 years (M = 16.65; SD = 1.49). The results revealed four categories of strategies: (1) mutual assertiveness: negotiation of one's own sexual needs, desires, and limits with those of the partner; (2) singular passiveness: repression of one's own sexual needs, desires, and limits to privilege those of the partner; (3) singular aggressiveness: prioritization of one's own sexual needs, desires, and limits over those of the partner; and (4) mutual lack of negotiation skills: neglecting both partners' sexual needs, desires, and limits. Among other things, adolescents' ability to be sexually assertive was hindered by anticipations, including assumptions leading to disregarding one's own sexual needs, desires, and limits or fearing to ignore the partner's. To promote mutually rewarding sexual activities and prevent sexual violence, sexual education initiatives should support adolescents' ability to assertively negotiate their sexuality with their partner and avoid passiveness, aggressiveness, and lack of negotiation.
Keywords: Adolescence; Qualitative analysis; Romantic relationships; Sexual assertiveness; Transactional analysis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
A Dyadic Analysis of Sexual Assertiveness and Sexual Outcomes in Adolescent Romantic Relationships.J Sex Res. 2025 Jan;62(1):127-138. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2282620. Epub 2023 Dec 8. J Sex Res. 2025. PMID: 38063498
-
Associations between Conflict Negotiation Strategies, Sexual Comfort, and Sexual Satisfaction in Adolescent Romantic Relationships.J Sex Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;60(3):305-314. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2043230. Epub 2022 Mar 1. J Sex Res. 2023. PMID: 35230217
-
Assertive Communication in Condom Negotiation: Insights From Late Adolescent Couples' Subjective Ratings of Self and Partner.J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 28. J Adolesc Health. 2015. PMID: 25937470 Free PMC article.
-
Dyadic Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships: The Dyadic Interactions Affecting Dyadic Sexual Desire Model.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):417-440. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02165-8. Epub 2022 Jan 15. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35031906 Review.
-
Behavioral Measures to Assess Adolescent Sexual Communication with Partners: A Scoping Review and Call for Further Studies.J Sex Res. 2023 Jan;60(1):36-44. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2103072. Epub 2022 Aug 8. J Sex Res. 2023. PMID: 35938905
Cited by
-
Associations of Implicit and Explicit Sexual Double Standard Endorsement and Sexual Assertiveness with Sexual and Interactional Competence in Emerging Adults.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 9;14(9):790. doi: 10.3390/bs14090790. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39336005 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adzovie, R. H., Essuman, J. K., & Nyarko-Sampson, E. (2018). Using transactional analysis to improve the marital satisfaction levels of Christian couples in Accra Metropolis, Ghana. International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 6(11), 295–304.
-
- Alberti, R. E., & Emmons, M. L. (1974). Your perfect right (2nd ed.). Impact.
-
- Assarroudi, A., Nabavi, F. H., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bauer, M., Hämmerli, S., & Leeners, B. (2020). Unmet needs in sex education—What adolescents aim to understand about sexuality of the other sex. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.015 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials