Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327138.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27138.

Association of Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies With Infant Morbidities and Maltreatment

Affiliations

Association of Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies With Infant Morbidities and Maltreatment

Sarah C M Roberts et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Figure 1.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340368. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40368. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37831457 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Research has found associations of pregnancy-specific alcohol policies with increased low birth weight and preterm birth, but associations with other infant outcomes are unknown.

Objective: To examine the associations of pregnancy-specific alcohol policies with infant morbidities and maltreatment.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used outcome data from Merative MarketScan, a national database of private insurance claims. The study cohort included individuals aged 25 to 50 years who gave birth to a singleton between 2006 and 2019 in the US, had been enrolled 1 year before and 1 year after delivery, and could be matched with an infant. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to April 2023.

Exposures: Nine state-level pregnancy-specific alcohol policies obtained from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's Alcohol Policy Information System.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were 1 or more infant injuries associated with maltreatment and infant morbidities associated with maternal alcohol consumption within the first year. Logistic regression, adjusting for individual-level and state-level controls, and fixed effects for state, year, state-specific time trends, and SEs clustered by state were used.

Results: A total of 1 432 979 birthing person-infant pairs were included (mean [SD] age of birthing people, 32.2 [4.2] years); 30 157 infants (2.1%) had injuries associated with maltreatment, and 44 461 (3.1%) infants had morbidities associated with alcohol use during pregnancy. The policies of Reporting Requirements for Assessment/Treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.52) and Mandatory Warning Signs (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27) were associated with increased odds of infant injuries but not morbidities. Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women Only was associated with decreased odds of infant injuries (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) but not infant morbidities. Civil Commitment was associated with increased odds of infant injuries (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48) but decreased odds of infant morbidities (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.53-0.62). Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women and Women With Children was associated with increased odds of both infant injuries (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25) and infant morbidities (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). Reporting Requirements for Child Protective Services, Reporting Requirements for Data, Child Abuse/Neglect, and Limits on Criminal Prosecution were not associated with infant injuries or morbidities.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, most pregnancy-specific alcohol policies were not associated with decreased odds of infant injuries or morbidities. Policy makers should not assume that pregnancy-specific alcohol policies improve infant health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Roberts reported receiving grants from the Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram for Cohort Extraction
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Number of States With Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies 2005 and 2019

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broccia M, Munch A, Hansen BM, et al. . Heavy prenatal alcohol exposure and overall morbidities: a Danish nationwide cohort study from 1996 to 2018. Lancet Public Health. 2023;8(1):e36-e46. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00289-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. May PA, de Vries MM, Marais AS, et al. . The prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in rural communities in South Africa: a third regional sample of child characteristics and maternal risk factors. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022;46(10):1819-1836. doi:10.1111/acer.14922 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. May PA, Chambers CD, Kalberg WO, et al. . Prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in 4 US communities. JAMA. 2018;319(5):474-482. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21896 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism . Alcohol Policy Information System. Accessed January 31, 2023. http://www.alcoholpolicy.niaaa.nih.gov/
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Alcohol consumption among pregnant and childbearing-aged women—United States, 1991 and 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46(16):346-350. - PubMed

Publication types