Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Aug;11(8):e006665.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006665.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind phase 2B trial of the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines to prevent recurrence of resected stage III/IV melanoma: a prespecified 36-month analysis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective, randomized, double-blind phase 2B trial of the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines to prevent recurrence of resected stage III/IV melanoma: a prespecified 36-month analysis

Elizabeth Lee Carpenter et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is made by ex vivo priming matured autologous dendritic cells (DCs) with yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) loaded with autologous tumor lysate (TL). The tumor lysate, particle only (TLPO) vaccine uses autologous TL-loaded YCWPs coated with silicate for in vivo DC loading. Here we report the 36-month prespecified analyses of this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial investigating the ability of the TLPO and TLPLDC (±granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)) vaccines to prevent melanoma recurrence in high-risk patients.

Methods: Patients with clinically disease-free stage III/IV melanoma were randomized 2:1 initially to TLPLDC versus placebo (n=124) and subsequently TLPO versus TLPLDC (n=63). All patients were randomized and blinded; however, the placebo control arm was replaced in the second randomization scheme with another novel vaccine; some analyses in this paper therefore reflect a combination of the two randomization schemes. Patients receiving the TLPLDC vaccine were further divided by their method of DC harvest (with or without G-CSF pretreatment); this was not randomized. The use of standard of care checkpoint inhibitors was not stratified between groups. Safety was assessed and Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses compared disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: After combining the two randomization processes, a total of 187 patients were allocated between treatment arms: placebo (n=41), TLPLDC (n=103), or TLPO (n=43). The allocation among arms created by the addition of patients from the two separate randomization schemes does not reflect concurrent randomization among all treatment arms. TLPLDC was further divided by use of G-CSF in DC harvest: no G-CSF (TLPLDC) (n=47) and with G-CSF (TLPLDC+G) (n=56). Median follow-up was 35.8 months. Only two patients experienced a related adverse event ≥grade 3, one each in the TLPLDC+G and placebo arms. DFS was 27.2% (placebo), 55.4% (TLPLDC), 22.9% (TLPLDC+G), and 60.9% (TLPO) (p<0.001). OS was 62.5% (placebo), 93.6% (TLPLDC), 57.7% (TLPLDC+G), and 94.6% (TLPO) (p=0.002).

Conclusions: The TLPO and TLPLDC (without G-CSF) vaccines were associated with improved DFS and OS in this clinical trial. Given production and manufacturing advantages, the efficacy of the TLPO vaccine will be confirmed in a phase 3 trial.

Trial registration number: NCT02301611.

Keywords: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunogenicity, Vaccine; Melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MF is an advisor for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Array Bioscience and Pulse Bioscience. TEW is an employee of Orbis Health Solutions. GEP is employed by Orbis Health Solutions and Cancer Insight; is a consultant for Rapamycin Holdings, Heat Biologics, Abexxa Biologics, and Pelican Therapeutics; and has received funding from the above as well as Sellas Life Sciences and Genentech. JJ served on a Novartis Melanoma Surgical Oncology Advisory Board. GTC is employed by Parthenon Therapeutics. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; TLPLDC, tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell; TLPLDC+G, TLPLDC with G-CSF; TLPO, tumor lysate, particle only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating DFS (A) and OS (B) between placebo (n=41), TLPLDC+G (n=56), TLPLDC (n=47), and TLPO (n=43). DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; TLPLDC, tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell; TLPLDC+G, TLPLDC with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; TLPO, tumor lysate, particle only.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DFS (A) and OS (B) for patients receiving CPI therapy (placebo (n=9), TLPLDC (n=16), TLPLDC+G (n=18), and TLPO (n=35)). CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; TLPLDC, tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell; TLPLDC+G, TLPLDC with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; TLPO, tumor lysate, particle only.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DFS (A) and OS (B) for patients who did not receive CPI therapy (placebo (n=32), TLPLDC (n=31), TLPLDC+G (n=38), and TLPO (n=8)). CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; TLPLDC, tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell; TLPLDC+G, TLPLDC with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; TLPO, tumor lysate, particle only.

References

    1. Davar D, Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant Immunotherapy of Melanoma and development of new approaches using the Neoadjuvant approach. Clin Dermatol 2013;31:237–50. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2012.08.012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Testori AAE, Chiellino S, van Akkooi ACJ. Adjuvant therapy for Melanoma: past, current, and future developments. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:1994. 10.3390/cancers12071994 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vreeland TJ, Clifton GT, Hale DF, et al. . A phase IIb randomized controlled trial of the TLPLDC vaccine as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of stage III/IV Melanoma: A primary analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:6126–37. 10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eroglu Z, Ribas A. Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for Melanoma: latest evidence and place in therapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2016;8:48–56. 10.1177/1758834015616934 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahid M, Jawed A, Mandal RK, et al. . Recent developments and obstacles in the treatment of Melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;125:84–8. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.005 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data