Real life use of prostacyclin analog (iloprost), a multi-centric survey data from the Scleroderma study group Emilia Romagna (Sclero-RER) and review of the literature
- PMID: 37539603
- PMCID: PMC10440762
- DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i4.14317
Real life use of prostacyclin analog (iloprost), a multi-centric survey data from the Scleroderma study group Emilia Romagna (Sclero-RER) and review of the literature
Abstract
Background and aim: Iloprost is recommend worldwide for the treatment of RP and the healing of DUs. The aim of this study is to report the regimens of Iloprost administered in different rheumatological centers within the same regional Health System Methods: A questionnaire exploring different items related to the use of Iloprost was developed and reviewed by three expert rheumatologists. The questionnaire was distributed as an online survey to all local SSc referral centers in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Data are reported as percentage or median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate. An updated review of world literature on this topic was also carried out.
Results: All the invited centers completed the survey. There were both local (8) and university hospitals (4). The majority (58%) had a rheumatologist as head physician. All centers used Iloprost: a single monthly administration was the most common treatment (75%). The cycle lasted 1 [IQR 1-2] days with a 0.5-2.0 ng/Kg/min dose according to the drug tolerance of the patients. There were overall 68 spots (beds, reclining armchair, or simple armchair); 2.0 [1.5-4.0] patients were able to receive Iloprost at the same time. University Hospitals had more physicians at their disposal than local hospitals but less paramedic personnel (respectively: 1.8 vs 1.2 physicians, 1.5 vs 2.1 nurses).
Conclusions: These observations were in line with the majority of previous studies reporting different regimens, comparing similar (but not identical) dose and schedule administration, however, despite differences being at times substantial, no standard infusion method is yet available.
Conflict of interest statement
Alarico Ariani received honoraria as a speaker and an advisory board member of Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Bruno farmaceutici, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Zentiva. Luca Magnani received honoraria as a speaker from Boehringer Ingelheim. Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
References
-
- Ferri C, Valentini G, Cozzi F, et al. Systemic sclerosis: demographic, clinical, and serologic features and survival in 1,012 Italian patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002;81(2):139–53. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200203000-00004. - PubMed
-
- Herrick AL, Wigley FM. Raynaud’s phenomenon. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34(1):101474. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101474. - PubMed
-
- Wigley FM. Vascular Disease in Scleroderma. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009;36(2–3):150–75. doi: 10.1007/s12016-008-8106-x. - PubMed
-
- Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, Drinane MC, Mollmark J, et al. Antiangiogenic plasma activity in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(10):3448–58. doi: 10.1002/art.22861. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
