Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 12;60(5):1048-1060.
doi: 10.1093/jme/tjad093.

Community-based integrated tick management programs: cost and feasibility scenarios

Terry L Schulze  1 , Lars Eisen  2 , Katie Russell  3 , Robert A Jordan  4
Affiliations

Community-based integrated tick management programs: cost and feasibility scenarios

Terry L Schulze et al. J Med Entomol. .

Abstract

Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of environmentally based control methods to suppress populations of the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis Say), but few of these estimated the cost of control. We estimated costs for a range of tick control methods (including habitat management, deer exclusion or population reduction, broadcast of acaricides, and use of host-targeted acaricides) implemented singly or in combination and applied to a model community comprising 320 residential properties and parklands. Using the high end for cost ranges, tick control based on a single method was estimated to have mean annual costs per household in the model community ranging from $132 for treating only forest ecotone with a broadcast synthetic acaricide to kill host-seeking ticks (or $404 for treating all residential forested habitat) to >$2,000 for deployment of bait boxes (SELECT TCS) across all residential tick habitat to treat rodents topically with acaricide to kill infesting ticks. Combining different sets of multiple methods in an integrated tick management program placed the annual cost between $508 and 3,192 annually per household in the model community, underscoring the disconnect between what people in Lyme disease endemic areas say they are willing to pay for tick control (not more than $100-150 annually) and the actual costs for tick control. Additional barriers to implementing community-based tick management programs within residential communities are discussed.

Keywords: Amblyomma; Ixodes; control; cost; tick.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Model community boundaries shown on aerial photo image of Millstone Township, Monmouth County, NJ.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beck A, Bjork J, Biggerstaff BJ, Eisen L, Eisen R, Foster E, Signs K, Tsao JI, Kough E, Peterson M, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding tick-borne disease prevention in Lyme disease-endemic areas of the Upper Midwest, United States. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022:13(3):101925. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101925 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloemer SR, Mount GA, Morris A, Zimmerman RH, Barnard DR, Snoddy EL. Management of lone star ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in recreational areas with acaricide applications, vegetative management, and exclusion of white-tailed deer. J Med Entomol. 1990:27:543–550. - PubMed
    1. Bron GM, Lee X, Paskawitz SM. Do-it-yourself tick control: granular gamma-cyhalothrin reduces Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs in residential backyards. J Med Entomol. 2020:58:749–755. - PubMed
    1. Brown JE, Miller TM, Machtinger ET. Tick tubes reduce blacklegged tick burdens on white-footed mice in Pennsylvania, USA. J Appl Entomol. 2020:144(6):542–545. 10.1111/jen.12758 - DOI
    1. Carroll JF, Kramer M. Winter activity of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and the operation of deer-targeted devices in Maryland. J Med Entomol. 2003:40(2):238–244. 10.1603/0022-2585-40.2.238 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types