Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 20;41(27):4341-4347.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01060. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Optimizing Lung Cancer Screening With Risk Prediction: Current Challenges and the Emerging Role of Biomarkers

Affiliations
Review

Optimizing Lung Cancer Screening With Risk Prediction: Current Challenges and the Emerging Role of Biomarkers

Julie Tsu-Yu Wu et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Lung cancer screening has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality, but its benefits must be weighed against the potential harms of unnecessary procedures, false-positive radiological findings, and overdiagnosis. Individuals at highest risk of lung cancer are more likely to maximize benefits while minimizing harm from screening. Although current lung cancer screening guidelines recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) only consider age and smoking history for screening eligibility, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other society guidelines recommend screening on the basis of individualized risk assessment including family history, environmental exposures, and presence of chronic lung disease. Risk prediction models have been developed to integrate various risk factors into an individualized risk prediction score. Previous evidence showed that risk prediction model-based screening eligibility could improve sensitivity for detecting lung cancer cases without reducing specificity. Furthermore, recent advances in lung cancer biomarkers have enhanced the performance of risk prediction in identifying lung cancer cases relative to the USPSTF criteria. These risk prediction models can be used to guide shared decision-making discussions before proceeding with lung cancer screening. This study aims to provide a concise overview of these prediction models and the emerging role of biomarker testing in risk prediction to facilitate conversations with patients. The goal was to assist clinicians in assessing individual patient risk, leading to more informed decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Julie Tsu-yu Wu

Honoraria: MJH Associates

Heather A. Wakelee

Consulting or Advisory Role: Mirati Therapeutics

Research Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Xcovery (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), ACEA Biosciences (Inst), Arrys Therapeutics (Inst), Merck (Inst), Seagen (Inst), Helsinn Therapeutics (Inst)

Uncompensated Relationships: Merck, Genentech/Roche

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Clinical flowchart of an initial lung cancer screening visit at Stanford. APP, advanced practice provider; LC, lung cancer; LCS, lung cancer screening; PCP, primary care provider.

References

    1. Osarogiagbon RU, Yang P-C, Sequist LV: Expanding the reach and grasp of lung cancer screening. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 43:e389958, 2023 - PubMed
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR Adams AM et al. : Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395-409, 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA: Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160:330-338, 2014 - PubMed
    1. Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, et al. : Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 325:971-987, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services : Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N). https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncacal-decision-memo...

Publication types

Substances