A multi-centre, double-blind, 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive N-Acetylcysteine for treatment-resistant PTSD
- PMID: 37540942
- DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115398
A multi-centre, double-blind, 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive N-Acetylcysteine for treatment-resistant PTSD
Abstract
Background: PTSD may involve oxidative stress, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may reduce the impact of oxidative stress in the brain. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant NAC in people with treatment-resistant PTSD.
Methods: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for adults with PTSD unresponsive to first-line treatment. The intervention was either oral NAC 2.7 g/day or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at 12 weeks compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes included depression and substance craving. Follow-up measures were obtained at 16 and 64-weeks.
Results: 133 patients were assessed, with 105 randomised; 81 participants completed the 12-week trial, 79 completed week-16 follow-up, and 21 completed week-64 follow-up. There were no significant differences between those taking NAC and those taking placebo in CAPS-5 scores at week 12, nor in secondary outcomes. Significant between-group differences were observed at week 64 in craving duration (Cohen's d = 1.61) and craving resistance (Cohen's d = 1.03), both in favour of NAC.
Conclusion: This was the first multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive NAC for treatment-resistant PTSD. No benefit of NAC was observed in this group beyond that provided by placebo at end of the trial.
Trial registration: ACTRN12618001784202, retrospectively registered 31/10/2018, URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376004.
Keywords: N-acetyl cysteine; Oxidative stress; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Randomised controlled trial; Treatment.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest MB has received grant support from MRFF, NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship 1156072, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) USA, AEDRTC Australian Eating Disorders Research and Translation Centre, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Baszucki Brain Research Fund, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond. Psykiatrisk Center Kobenhavn, Stanley Medical Research Institute, Victorian Government Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, Wellcome Trust, Victorian Medical Research Acceleration Fund, Centre for Research Excellence CRE, Victorian COVID-19 Research Fund. He has had consultancies with Lundbeck, Controversias Barcelona, Servier, Medisquire, HealthEd, ANZJP, EPA, Janssen, Medplan, RANZCP, Abbott India, ASCP, Headspace, Sandoz, Aust Psychosis, International Society of Bipolar Disorder, Precision Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine, Shanghai Mental Health Centre. (Last 3 years) – all unrelated to this work. CHN served as a consultant for Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Grunbiotics, Servier and Eli Lilly, and speaker honoraria from Servier, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, and Pfizer in the last 5 years – all unrelated to this study. The other authors declare they have no competing interests
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous