Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis
- PMID: 37545248
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34853
Depression, anxiety, and the risk of cancer: An individual participant data meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Depression and anxiety have long been hypothesized to be related to an increased cancer risk. Despite the great amount of research that has been conducted, findings are inconclusive. To provide a stronger basis for addressing the associations between depression, anxiety, and the incidence of various cancer types (overall, breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, alcohol-related, and smoking-related cancers), individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses were performed within the Psychosocial Factors and Cancer Incidence (PSY-CA) consortium.
Methods: The PSY-CA consortium includes data from 18 cohorts with measures of depression or anxiety (up to N = 319,613; cancer incidences, 25,803; person-years of follow-up, 3,254,714). Both symptoms and a diagnosis of depression and anxiety were examined as predictors of future cancer risk. Two-stage IPD meta-analyses were run, first by using Cox regression models in each cohort (stage 1), and then by aggregating the results in random-effects meta-analyses (stage 2).
Results: No associations were found between depression or anxiety and overall, breast, prostate, colorectal, and alcohol-related cancers. Depression and anxiety (symptoms and diagnoses) were associated with the incidence of lung cancer and smoking-related cancers (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.06-1.60). However, these associations were substantially attenuated when additionally adjusting for known risk factors including smoking, alcohol use, and body mass index (HRs, 1.04-1.23).
Conclusions: Depression and anxiety are not related to increased risk for most cancer outcomes, except for lung and smoking-related cancers. This study shows that key covariates are likely to explain the relationship between depression, anxiety, and lung and smoking-related cancers. PREREGISTRATION NUMBER: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=157677.
Keywords: anxiety; cancer; depression; meta-analysis; risk.
© 2023 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Comment in
-
Robust analysis challenges theory that depression and anxiety increase cancer risk.Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Oct;28(4):285. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023. PMID: 37844947 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Antoni MH, Lutgendorf SK, Cole SW, et al. The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(3):240-248. doi:10.1038/nrc1820
-
- Chida Y, Hamer M, Wardle J, Steptoe A. Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5(8):466-475. doi:10.1038/ncponc1134
-
- Jia Y, Li F, Liu YF, Zhao JP, Leng MM, Chen L. Depression and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2017;149:138-148. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.026
-
- Wang YH, Li JQ, Shi JF, et al. Depression and anxiety in relation to cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Mol Psychiatr. 2020;25(7):1487-1499. doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0595-x
-
- McGee R, Williams S, Elwood M. Depression and the development of cancer: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):187-192. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90314-x
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical