Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 20:17:1200962.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1200962. eCollection 2023.

Neurophysiological signatures of sensory-processing sensitivity

Nicole Meinersen-Schmidt  1 , Nike Walter  2 , Patricia Kulla  1 , Thomas Loew  2 , Thilo Hinterberger  2 , Joachim Kruse  1
Affiliations

Neurophysiological signatures of sensory-processing sensitivity

Nicole Meinersen-Schmidt et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: Sensory processing sensitivity is mainly captured based on questionnaires and it's neurophysiological basis is largely unknown. As hitherto no electroencephalography (EEG) study has been carried out, the aim of this work was to determine whether the self-reported level of SPS correlates with the EEG activity in different frequency bands.

Methods: One hundred fifteen participants were measured with 64-channel EEG during a task-free resting state. After artifact correction, a power spectrum time series was calculated using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for the following frequency bands: Delta: 1-3.5 Hz, theta: 4-7.5 Hz, alpha1: 8-10 Hz, alpha2: 10.5-12 Hz, beta1: 12.5-15 Hz, beta2: 15.5-25 Hz, gamma: 25.5-45 Hz, global: 1-45 Hz. Correlations with the 'Highly Sensitive Person Scale' (HSPS-G) scores were determined. Then, the lowest and the highest 30% of the cohort were contrasted as polar opposites. EEG features were compared between the two groups applying a paired two-tailed t-test.

Results: The HSPS-G scores correlated statistically significantly positive with beta 1 and 2, and global EEG power during resting with eyes open, but not during resting with eyes closed. The highly sensitive group revealed higher beta power (4.38 ± 0.32 vs. 4.21 ± 0.17, p = 0.014), higher gamma power (4.21 ± 0.37 vs. 4.00 ± 0.25, p = 0.010), and increased global EEG power (4.38 ± 0.29 vs. 4.25 ± 0.17, p = 0.041). The higher EEG activity in the HSP group was most pronounced in the central, parietal, and temporal region, whereas lower EEG activity was most present in occipital areas.

Conclusion: For the first time, neurophysiological signatures associated with SPS during a task free resting state were demonstrated. Evidence is provided that neural processes differ between HSP and non-HSP. During resting with eyes open HSP exhibit higher EEG activity suggesting increased information processing. The findings could be of importance for the development of biomarkers for clinical diagnostics and intervention efficacy evaluation.

Keywords: EEG; diagnostics; global activity; power spectral density; sensory-processing sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Topographical maps of differences in the effect size calculated for each frequency band comparing the groups of highly sensitive persons and low sensitive persons.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acevedo B. P., Aron E. N., Aron A., Sangster M.-D., Collins N., Brown L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions. Brain Behav. 4, 580–594. doi: 10.1002/brb3.242, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acevedo B., Aron E., Pospos S., Jessen D. (2018). The functional highly sensitive brain: a review of the brain circuits underlying sensory processing sensitivity and seemingly related disorders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 373:20170161 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0161, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acevedo B. P., Santander T., Marhenke R., Aron A., Aron E. (2021). Sensory processing sensitivity predicts individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity associated with depth of processing. Neuropsychobiology 80, 185–200. doi: 10.1159/000513527, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahadi B., Basharpoor S. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity, personality dimensions and mental health. J. Appl. Sci. 10, 570–574. doi: 10.3923/jas.2010.570.574 - DOI
    1. Aron E. N., Aron A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73, 345–368. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.345, PMID: - DOI - PubMed