Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 31;31(4):e260330.
doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233104e260330. eCollection 2023.

ROLE OF INCISIONAL VACUUM THERAPY IN ENDOPROSTHETIC BONE RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY

Affiliations

ROLE OF INCISIONAL VACUUM THERAPY IN ENDOPROSTHETIC BONE RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY

André Mathias Baptista et al. Acta Ortop Bras. .

Abstract

Reconstructive surgery with endoprostheses is the chosen method for treating bone malignancies. Postoperative infections are frequent complications, and their treatment involves prolonged hospital stays and antibiotic therapy. Among the advancements aimed at reducing the rate of postoperative infection, the use of incisional negative pressure therapy (iNPT) has shown promising results, with no reports in the literature regarding its use in patients with such conditions.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of iNPT in reducing postoperative complications in surgeries for resection of bone tumors associated with modular endoprosthesis reconstruction.

Methods: Retrospective case series of 16 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma, who underwent resection and reconstruction with endoprosthesis associated with iNPT during the postoperative period. Follow-up was performed for a period of six months, and the evaluated outcomes were the incidence of postoperative infection and complications of the surgical wound.

Results: The use of iNPT for a postoperative period of seven days resulted in only three (18.7%) cases of postoperative infection. No cases of wound dehiscence, seroma formation, or hematoma at the surgical site were observed.

Conclusion: The rate of surgical wound complications in our case series is lower than that reported in most of the literature, and iNPT appears to be an efficient way to reduce the rate of local complications in reconstructive surgeries with endoprosthesis after resection of bone malignancies. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Study.

A cirurgia reconstrutiva com endopróteses é o método escolhido no tratamento de malignidades ósseas. As infecções pós-operatórias são complicações frequentes, e seu tratamento envolve internações e antibioticoterapia prolongadas. Entre os avanços que visam reduzir a taxa de infecção pós-operatória, o uso da terapia com pressão negativa incisional (TPNi) vem mostrando resultados promissores, não havendo relatos na literatura de seu emprego em pacientes com tal quadro.

Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia da TPNi em reduzir complicações pós-operatórias em cirurgias de ressecção de tumores ósseos associadas à reconstrução com endopróteses modulares.

Métodos: Série de casos retrospectiva de 16 pacientes diagnosticados com osteossarcoma, submetidos à ressecção e reconstrução com endoprótese associada à TPNi durante o pós-operatório. Foi realizado seguimento por um período de seis meses e os desfechos avaliados foram incidência de infecção pós-operatória e complicações da ferida operatória.

Resultados: O uso da TPNi por um período pós-operatório de sete dias resultou em apenas três (18,7%) casos de infecção pós-operatória. Não foram observados casos em que ocorreu deiscência da ferida operatória, formação de seromas ou hematomas no sítio cirúrgico.

Conclusão: A taxa de complicações de ferida operatória em nossa série de casos é menor que a da maior parte da literatura, e a TPNi parece ser uma forma eficiente de reduzir a taxa de complicações locais em cirurgias reconstrutivas com endoprótese após ressecção de malignidades ósseas. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Retrospectivo.

Keywords: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy; Osteosarcoma; Prostheses and Implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no potential conflict or interest related to this article.

References

    1. Hardes J, Gebert C, Schwappach A, Ahrens H, Stretburger A, Winkelmann W, Gosheger G. Characteristics and outcome of infections associated with tumor edoprostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:289–296. - PubMed
    1. Jeys LM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Periprosthetic infection in patients treated for na orthopaedic oncological condition. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(4):842–849. - PubMed
    1. Theil C, Röder J, Gosheger G, Deventer N, Dieckmann R, Schorn D. What is the likelihood that tumor endoprostheses will experience a second complication after first revision in patients with primary malignant bone tumor and what are potential risk factors? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(12):2705–2714. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Theil C, Schneider KN, Gosheger G, Dieckmann R, Deventer N, Hardes J. Does the duration of primary and first revision surgery influence the probability of first and subsequent implant failures after extremity sarcoma resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction? Cancers. 2021;13(11):2510–2510. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broex ECJ, van Asselt ADI, Bruggeman CA, van Tiel FH. Surgical site infections: how high are the costs? J Hosp Infect. 2009;72(3):193–201. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources