Critical Care Units in Malawi: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 37547484
- PMCID: PMC10402812
- DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4053
Critical Care Units in Malawi: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: The global burden of critical illness falls disproportionately outside high-income countries. Despite younger patient populations with similar or lower disease severity, critical illness outcomes are poor outside high-income countries. A lack of data limits attempts to understand and address the drivers of critical care outcomes outside high-income countries.
Objectives: We aim to characterize the organization, available resources, and service capacity of public sector critical care units in Malawi and identify barriers to improving care.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Malawi Emergency and Critical Care Survey, a cross-sectional study performed from January to February 2020 at all four central hospitals and a simple random sample of nine out of 24 public sector district hospitals in Malawi, a predominantly rural, low-income country of 19.6 million in southern Africa. Data from critical care units were used to characterize resources, processes, and barriers to care.
Findings: There were four HDUs and four ICUs across the 13 hospitals in the Malawi Emergency and Critical Care Survey sample. The median critical care beds per 1,000,000 catchment was 1.4 (IQR: 0.9 to 6.7). Absent equipment was the most common barrier in HDUs (46% [95% CI: 32% to 60%]). Stockouts was the most common barriers in ICUs (48% [CI: 38% to 58%]). ICUs had a median 3.0 (range: 2 to 8) functional ventilators per unit and reported an ability to perform several quality mechanical ventilation interventions.
Conclusions: Although significant gaps exist, Malawian critical care units report the ability to perform several complex clinical processes. Our results highlight regional inequalities in access to care and support the use of process-oriented questions to assess critical care capacity. Future efforts should focus on basic critical care capacity outside of urban areas and quantify the impact of context-specific variables on critical care mortality.
Keywords: Malawi; critical care; facility assessment; health systems strengthening; high dependency unit; intensive care unit.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Paul D Sonenthal received support for this study from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, in the form of a faculty research fund. He also reports consulting fees from the University of California-San Francisco/Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources, and funding from Unitaid (Grant SPHQ15-LOA-045). Shada A Rouhani received support for this study from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, in the form of a seed grant. She also reports consulting fees from Partners In Health and the World Health Organization. Joia S Mukherjee is the Chief Medical Officer at Partners In Health and sits on the boards of Village Health Works (Burundi/Muso and Mali), the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, and Free Speech for People. The authors have no other interests to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Lozano R, Fullman N, Mumford JE, et al. Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396: 1250–84. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30750-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pisani L, Algera AG, Neto AS, et al. Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management, and outcomes in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled analysis of four observational studies. Lancet Glob Health. 2022; 10: e227–35. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00485-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
