Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
- PMID: 37547762
- PMCID: PMC10398395
- DOI: 10.32604/or.2023.030351
Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m2/daily chemotherapy treatment was applied in both groups. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) was administered at baseline and at three and six months after CRT. A total of 60 patients with LARC randomized to receive IC-CRT (n = 30) or LC-CRT (n = 30) were included in this phase II randomized trial. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of pathological outcomes, including pathological response rates (ypT0N0-complete response: 23.3% vs. 16.7%, respectively, and ypT0-2N0-downstaging: 50% for each; p = 0.809) and Dworak score-based pathological tumor regression grade (Grade 4-complete response: 23.3 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.839). The 5-year overall survival (73.3 vs. 86.7%, p = 0.173) rate was also similar. The acute radiation dermatitis (p < 0.001) and any hematological toxicity (p = 0.004) rates were significantly higher in the LC-CRT group, while no significant difference was noted between treatment groups in terms of baseline, third month, and sixth month EORTC QLQ-CR29 scores.
Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer.
© 2023 Senyurek et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
Figures
References
-
- Bujko, K., Nowacki, M. P., Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A., Michalski, W., Bebenek, M.et al. (2006). Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. The British Journal of Surgery , 93(10), 1215–1223. 10.1002/bjs.5506; - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ngan, S. Y., Burmeister, B., Fisher, R. J., Solomon, M., Goldstein, D.et al. (2012). Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. Journal of Clinical Oncology , 30(31), 3827–3833. 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.9597; - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liu, J., Ladbury, C., Glaser, S., Fakih, M., Kaiser, A. M.et al. (2023). Patterns of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy at predominately academic centers between 2016–2020: An NCDB analysis. Clinical Colorectal Cancer , 22(2), 167–174. 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.01.005; - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cisel, B., Pietrzak, L., Michalski, W., Wyrwicz, L., Rutkowski, A.et al. (2019). Long-course preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for clinical T4 and fixed clinical T3 rectal cancer: Long-term results of the randomized Polish II study. Annals of Oncology , 30(8), 1298–1303. 10.1093/annonc/mdz186; - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials