Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;17(2):73-79.
doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v17i2.12869.

Comparison of Two Different Intervals of Misoprostol Administration in Second Trimester Abortions

Affiliations

Comparison of Two Different Intervals of Misoprostol Administration in Second Trimester Abortions

Anjali Gupta et al. J Family Reprod Health. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of two different intervals of misoprostol administration after mifepristone in second trimester abortions.

Materials and methods: This 12-month prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care facility. Only pregnancies with congenital deformity or sterilisation failure were included in the study's recruitment of 100 women who visited the hospital for a second trimester abortion between 12 and 20 weeks; cases with scarred uteri were omitted. In a systematic random selection of 50 women in each group, the administration of 200 mg of mifepristone orally was followed by two distinct intervals of intravaginal misoprostol administration at 24- and 48-hour intervals. After 24 hours, group A women received intravaginal 400 mcg misoprostol three hourly, up to a maximum of five doses, while group B received the same doses after 48 hours. Induction abortion interval noted on various parameters and paired t test and chi square test applied.

Results: The mean IAI following misoprostol administration was 8.14 2±.03 hours in group A and 7.71 ±2.56 hours in group B. This difference was statistically insignificant. Average misoprostol doses for group A were 1.68±0.71 and for the group, B were 1.68±0.84; both doses were found to be statistically insignificant when used to induce abortion. All women aborted successfully in each group. There was no significant difference in side effects in both groups.

Conclusion: Based on the results it was observed that shorter interval between mifepristone and misoprostol i.e., 24 hours can be chosen to decrease the hospital stay as there was no significant difference was seen after intravaginal misoprostol in terms of induction abortion interval, number of doses and side effects.

Keywords: Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Second Trimester Abortion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests Authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Success rate of induced abortion (expulsion of abortus within 24 hours)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar S. Second Trimester Medical Abortion with Mifepristone-Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone: A Review of Methods and Management. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16:162–172. - PubMed
    1. Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13:37–52. - PubMed
    1. Cooper DB, Menefee GW. Dilatation and Curettage. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. - PubMed
    1. Grimes DA. The Choice of Second Trimester Abortion Method: Evolution, Evidence and Ethics. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16:183–188. - PubMed
    1. Tang OS, Ho PC. Medical abortion in the second trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 16:237–246. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources