Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307.
doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care

Affiliations

Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care

Doris Verwijmeren et al. Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Although shared decision making (SDM) has become the most preferable way in doctor-patient communication, it is not fully implemented in mental health care likely due to the complex nature of psychiatric syndromes and treatments. In this review we provide a systematic overview of all perceived and reported barriers to SDM in the literature, acknowledging field-specific challenges, and offering perspectives to promote its wider use. We conducted a systematic search of the wider literature in different databases and included all publications mentioning specified barriers to SDM in psychiatric care. Relevant data and opinions were categorised into micro-, meso- and macro-level themes and put into clinical perspective. We derived 20 barriers to SDM from 100 studies and reports. Eight were on micro-level care delivery, seven involved meso-level issues, five concerned macro-level themes. The multitude of perceived and actual barriers to SDM underline the challenges its implementation poses in mental health care, some of which can be resolved while others are inherent to the nature of the care, with its long-term relationships, complex dynamics, and social consequences, all requiring a flexible approach. We present four perspectives to help change views on the potential of SDM in mental health care.

Keywords: Mental health; Patient-centred care; Recovery-oriented health care; Review; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the search strategy

References

    1. Adams JR, Drake RE. Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice. Community Mental Health Journal. 2006;42(1):87–105. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-9005-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alguera-Lara V, Dowsey MM, Ride J, Kinder S, Castle D. Shared decision making in mental health: The importance for current clinical practice. Australasian Psychiatry. 2017;25(6):578–582. doi: 10.1177/1039856217734711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali S, Smith TL, Mican L, Brown C. Psychiatric providers’ willingness to participate in shared decision making when prescribing psychotropics. The Journal of Pharmacy Technology. 2015;31(5):212–218. doi: 10.1177/8755122515578288. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. An SY, Kim GH, Kim JY. Effectiveness of shared decision-making training program in people with schizophrenia in South Korea. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2017;53(2):111–118. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews SB, Drake T, Haslett W, Munusamy R. Developing web-based online support tools: The Dartmouth decision support software. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2010;34(1):37–41. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.37.41. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types