Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):2133-2136.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009574. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

EarWell Infant Ear Molding Device: Experience and Parent Survey

Affiliations

EarWell Infant Ear Molding Device: Experience and Parent Survey

Moumen Ahmed et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: EarWell infant ear molding device is a noninvasive, nonsurgical option to treat ear deformities in early infancy. There are no studies involving the parents' perspective to the use of the EarWell.

Aim: To investigate our experience with EarWell infant ear molding device and to assess the parents' satisfaction.

Study design: A retrospective case series study of infants with congenital ear deformities who were treated with EarWell device from October 2021 to November 2022. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Clinical photographs were obtained before, during, and after treatment. Parents' satisfaction level was assessed through telephone encounters and surveys, and issues associated with device application were identified. Clinical improvement of ear deformity was graded into poor, fair, good, and excellent.

Results: A total of 9 patients with congenital ear deformities were identified and included in this study (7 bilateral deformities and 2 unilateral deformities). The mean adjusted age of the initial treatment is 17 weeks (4-23 weeks), and the mean treatment duration is 5.7 weeks. The authors received full 8 responses from the parents' survey, and all parents were satisfied with post-treatment results (4 satisfied, 1 fully satisfied, and 2 very satisfied). Issues associated with device application were 3 superficial skin ulcers and 4 skin irritation. Clinical Improvement grades were: 5 excellent improvement, 2 good improvement, and 2 fair improvement.

Conclusions: On the basis of our experience, the EarWell device has shown a high success rate and a low complication rate. It is well accepted by parents, but it needs close follow-up to detect minor device-related issues. The device is safe for multiple skin types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anstadt EE, Johns DN, Kwok AC, et al. Neonatal ear molding: timing and technique. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20152831
    1. Bhatti SL, Daly LT, Mejia M, et al. Ear abnormalities. Pediatr Rev 2021;42:180–188
    1. Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, et al. Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:263–268
    1. Chan S, Lim G, Por YC, et al. Efficacy of ear molding in infants using the EarWell Infant Correction System and factors affecting outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:648e–658e
    1. Kurozumi N, Ono S, Ishida H. Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam. Br J Plast Surg 1982;35:181–182

LinkOut - more resources