This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 1986 Aug;110(8):685-6.

Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity

J R Beck

PMID: 3755323

Editorial

Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity

J R Beck. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Aug.

. 1986 Aug;110(8):685-6.

Author

J R Beck

PMID: 3755323

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J. Radack KL, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Aug;110(8):689-93. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986. PMID: 3755325
The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC, Loring DW. Bowden SC, et al. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Sep;15(5):769-76. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990373. Epub 2009 Jul 28. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009. PMID: 19635177
Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA, Del Castillo Jde D. Nofuentes JA, et al. Stat Med. 2007 Sep 30;26(22):4179-201. doi: 10.1002/sim.2850. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17357992
Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ. Drobatz KJ. J Vet Cardiol. 2009 May;11 Suppl 1:S33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 May 17. J Vet Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19451045 Review.
Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA, Greenberg PB, Poole PJ. Scott IA, et al. Intern Med J. 2008 Feb;38(2):120-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01436.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23. Intern Med J. 2008. PMID: 17645501 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer.
Drieskens O, Oyen R, Van Poppel H, Vankan Y, Flamen P, Mortelmans L. Drieskens O, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Dec;32(12):1412-7. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1886-9. Epub 2005 Aug 31. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005. PMID: 16133380 Clinical Trial.
Likelihood ratios: a real improvement for clinical decision making?
Dujardin B, Van den Ende J, Van Gompel A, Unger JP, Van der Stuyft P. Dujardin B, et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;10(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/BF01717448. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 7957786 Review.
Advantages of FDG-PET/CT over CT alone in the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.
Karashima R, Watanabe M, Imamura Y, Ida S, Baba Y, Iwagami S, Miyamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Yoshida N, Baba H. Karashima R, et al. Surg Today. 2015 Apr;45(4):471-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0965-6. Epub 2014 Jun 28. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 24969050
Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.
Lerut T, Flamen P, Ectors N, Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Hiele M, De Wever W, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Deneffe G, Van Raemdonck D, Mortelmans L. Lerut T, et al. Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):743-52. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00003. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 11088069 Free PMC article.
Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer.
Mochiki E, Kuwano H, Katoh H, Asao T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Mochiki E, et al. World J Surg. 2004 Mar;28(3):247-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7191-5. Epub 2004 Feb 17. World J Surg. 2004. PMID: 14961197

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information