Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 27:62:102113.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102113. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Toxicity profile of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: practical considerations

Affiliations
Review

Toxicity profile of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: practical considerations

Andrea D'Arienzo et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel and evolving class of antineoplastic agents, constituted by monoclonal antibody linked to biologically active drugs, delivering cytotoxic compounds at the tumor site, reducing the likelihood of systemic exposure and toxicity. They are generally well tolerated, nevertheless some predictable adverse reactions need careful monitoring and timely approach. These include neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, diarrhea, left ventricular dysfunction, ILD/pneumonitis. The mechanisms leading to drug-associated toxicities are summarized, and prophylaxis protocols and appropriate management strategies are proposed, based on current literature. This review aims to collect the most updated evidence on toxicities potentially occurring during breast cancer treatment with approved or under clinical investigation (advanced stage) ADCs. A focus is dedicated to monitoring protocols and clinical management, aimed at preventing and/or promptly address relevant problems, in order to avoid premature discontinuation or improper dose reduction.

Keywords: Antibody drug conjugates; Breast cancer; Toxicity management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AV has received travel grants from Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Gilead. MP has received travel grants from Pfizer and Gilead. RC declares honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, Gilead, Seagen, Veracyte, Daichii Sankyo, Pierre-Fabre; she is advisory board member for Novartis, Lilly, Gilead, Seagen, Daichii Sankyo, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Astra Zeneca, and MSD; she has received travel grants from Gilead, Lilly and Novartis. FP received honoraria for advisory boards, activities as a speaker, travel grants, research grants from AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Exact Sciences, Menarini, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen. He has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Eisai and Roche. MG is a consultant/advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seagen; he has received travel grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and research funding (to institution) from AstraZeneca. LDM is a consultant/advisory board member for Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact science, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, AstraZeneca, GSK, Seagen, and Agendia; she has received research support from Roche, Lilly, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis (to institution); she declares honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Ipsen, Exact science, AstraZeneca and Novartis; has received travel grants from Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. GA is a consultant/advisory board member for Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, and Gilead; she has received research support from AstraZeneca (to institution); declares honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Seagen, Viatris, Exact Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis; has received travel grants from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis. MDL is a consultant/advisory board member for Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Seagen, Novartis, Ipsen, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, and GSK; he declares honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Seagen, Takeda, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Tomalab, Gilead, Genetic, Menarini, and Sophos; has received travel grants from Roche, AstraZeneca. FM is a consultant/advisory board member for Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen; he received honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen Pierre Fabre, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; he has received travel grants from AstraZeneca. AD, FN, SP, and MV have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Main AEs described with ADCs for BC treatment. Drugs needing prophylaxis use or medical/laboratory screening are indicated. Created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hematological AEs monitoring and management. Hematological toxicities may have life-threatening consequences, therefore complete blood count (CBC) assessment is always recommended before ADC administration. Blood counts should be also monitored periodically during the treatment, in addition to evaluating the possible interactions with other medication. As described in the present figure, in case of adverse events, dose adjustment or discontinuation may be needed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Monitoring and management of T-DM1 (a) and T-DXd (b) related cardiovascular toxicity. In metastatic HER2-positive disease, TTE is recommended every 3 months during the first year and, in absence of cardiovascular toxicity, every 6 months. In early-stage BC, it is recommended to perform TTE every 3 months during anti-HER2 treatment and within 12 months after completion. Created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Nausea and vomiting prophylaxis regimens. For moderate-emetogenic agents, a 2-drugs prophylactic regimen can be administered on day 1 of each cycle. It should include a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) (e.g., ondansetron, palonosetron, granisetron) and dexamethasone (DMX). For high-risk patients (e.g., young women with little use of alcohol or who previously experienced NV), or in case of refractory emesis, a NK1 RA can be added (e.g., aprepitant, fosaprepitant, netupitant) in a 3-drug regimen. For delayed-onset emesis, single agent 5-HT3 RA or DMX can be offered on day 2 and 3 after the standard prophylactic regimen administered on day 1; alternatively, aprepitant (with or without DMX) can be employed if the NK-1 RA had been administered on day 1. Importantly, given their long duration of action, palonosetron and NK1 RAs other then aprepitant must not be continued at day 2–3 as well as granisetron subcutaneous or transdermal. For low emetogenic agents NCCN guidelines recommend single agent therapy with DMX 8–12 mg or single dose metoclopramide 10–20 mg or prochlorperzane 10 mg or single dose 5-HT3 RA.

References

    1. Sakach E., Sacks R., Kalinsky K. Trop-2 as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancers. 2022;14:5936. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/23/5936/htm [cited 2023 Mar 17]Available from: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu Y., Liu K., Wang K., Zhu H. Treatment-related adverse events of antibody–drug conjugates in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2023;129(2):283–295. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34507. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Serivices, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V. 5.0. 2017
    1. Krop I.E., Kim S.-B.B., González-Martín A., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician’s choice for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (TH3RESA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):689–699. - PubMed
    1. Verma S., Miles D., Gianni L., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1783–1791. - PMC - PubMed