Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 5;12(1):2243169.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2023.2243169. eCollection 2023.

Light on life: immunoscore immune-checkpoint, a predictor of immunotherapy response

Affiliations
Review

Light on life: immunoscore immune-checkpoint, a predictor of immunotherapy response

Assia Hijazi et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

In the last decade, a plethora of immunotherapeutic strategies have been designed to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. In particular, immune checkpoint (IC) blockade therapies present the most promising advances made in cancer treatment in recent years. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarkers predicting response to IC treatments are currently lacking. We have recently identified Immunoscore-IC, a powerful biomarker that predicts the efficiency of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC patients. Immunoscore-IC is an in vitro diagnostic assay that quantifies densities of PD-L1+, CD8+ cells, and distances between CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunoscore-IC can classify responder vs non-responder NSCLC patients for ICIs therapy and is revealed as a promising predictive marker of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in these patients. Immunoscore-IC has also shown a significant predictive value, superior to the currently used PD-L1 marker. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the addition of atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-IC emerged as the first biomarker with robust predictive value in stratifying pMMR metastatic CRC patients who critically benefit from checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, Immunoscore-IC could be a universal biomarker to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy across multiple cancer indications. Therefore, cancer patient stratification (by Immunoscore-IC), based on the presence of T lymphocytes and PD-L1 potentially provides support for clinicians to guide them through combination cancer treatment decisions.

Keywords: PD-L1; T-cells; Tumor microenvironment (TME); biomarkers; cancer; immune checkpoint (IC); immunoscore; immunotherapy; response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JG has patents associated with immune prognostic biomarkers and immunotherapies. JG is co-founder of HalioDx Biotech Company, a Veracyte company and has part-time employment at Veracyte. Immunoscore® a registered trademark from the National Institute of Health and Medical Research licensed to Veracyte.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Predictive biomarkers of response and/or survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint immunotherapy. MSI: microsatellite instability, TMB: Tumor mutational burden, GES: gene expression signature, TILs: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, TLS: Tertiary lymphoid structures, Immunoscore-IC: digital pathology of CD8+/PD-L1+ cells, Immunoscore: digital pathology of CD3+/CD8+ cells.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Immunoscore-IC assay. Duplex chromogenic immunohistochemistry on a single FFPE slide. Representative IHC staining of tumors with CD8 and PD-L1 antibodies, before (left) and after (right) digital pathology detection. Immunoscore-IC scores are generated using densities and proximities of CD8 and PD-L1 cells.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of immunoscore-IC-High and Immunoscore-IC-Low (left) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients from AtezoTribe trial. Proportion (%) of patients according to MMR, TMB and immunoscore-IC status. Proportion (%) of patients relapsing in the treatment arm for each category (right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galon J, Bruni D.. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(3):197–8. doi:10.1038/s41573-018-0007-y. PMID: 30610226. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruni D, Angell HK, Galon J. The immune contexture and immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(11):662–680. doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0285-7. PMID: 32753728. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kallingal A, Olszewski M, Maciejewska N, Brankiewicz W, Baginski M. Cancer immune escape: the role of antigen presentation machinery. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(10):8131–8141. doi:10.1007/s00432-023-04737-8. PMID: 37031434. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Angell HK, Galon J. The immune landscape of human tumors: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunol. 2014;3(2):e27456. doi:10.4161/onci.27456. PMID: 24800163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Fridman WH, Galon J. The prognostic impact of anti-cancer immune response: a novel classification of cancer patients. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33(4):335–340. doi:10.1007/s00281-011-0264-x. PMID: 21461991. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types