Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 1;34(6):1772-1775.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009594. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

Speech Outcomes Audit for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate After 2-Stage Palate Repair: Preliminary Results

Affiliations

Speech Outcomes Audit for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate After 2-Stage Palate Repair: Preliminary Results

Melissa Zattoni Antoneli et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Primary cleft lip and palate surgeries can interfere with speech status, facial appearance, maxillary growth, and psychosocial and academic development. Therefore, different surgical protocols and techniques have been proposed, and adequate velopharyngeal function and speech is the main goal for the treatment success. The present study aimed to report preliminary speech results of the 2-stage palate repair of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. One hundred seventy nonsyndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were included in this report, 35% males and 65% females, submitted to the 2-stage palatoplasty protocol, composed by lip, nasal ala, and hard palate repair at 3 to 6 m (stage 1) and soft palate repair at 12 to 18 m (stage 2). The target age range for speech recording was 5 to 10 years, and the speech material included repetition of Brazilian Portuguese sentences. These samples were obtained over 5 years and assessed by 3 of 14 experienced speech pathologists. When discordant, the majority rate was adopted. Average velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) rates were 19,5%, varying according to the soft palate technique, with better results when the Sommerlad technique was performed (VPD=11%), followed by Braithwaite (VPD=15%) and then Von Langenbeck (VPD=25%). Passive errors were observed in 32% and active errors in 25%. Speech results reflect the outcomes of an interdisciplinary team's work, where facial growth and nasolabial appearance must also be considered. Further analysis and a wider casuistic are recommended. Hence outcomes audit needs to be a permanent process, providing solid and updated evidence for optimal cleft care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Sell D. Issues in perceptual analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2005;40:102–121
    1. Oates J. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2009;61:49–56
    1. Yamashita RP, Borg E, Granqvist S, et al. Reliability of hypernasality rating: compariso of 3 different methods for perceptual assessment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018;55:1060–1071
    1. Phua YS, de Chalain T. Incidence of oronasal fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair: an audit of 211 children born between 1990 and 2004. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008;45:172–178
    1. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall; 1991