Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 10;38(9):1113-1120.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad052.

Methodological reflections: developing the WHO database of violence against women policies

Affiliations
Review

Methodological reflections: developing the WHO database of violence against women policies

Katherine Watson et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

This paper presents methodological reflections from the development of the World Health Organization (WHO) Violence against Women (VAW) Policies Database (hereinafter referred to as 'the Database') to inform future efforts to create similar public health policy databases for government accountability. Using the WHO Global Plan of Action on Violence accountability measures as a starting point, the Database was developed over a 2-year period in consultation with a reference group. A subset of indicators was piloted before finalization of a full list and the structure of the Database. Available VAW policies from 194 WHO Member States were reviewed by a team of consultants, who conducted content analysis and data entry. A 'Manual and User Guide' was developed to record decisions related to the processes for developing the Database. This guide was used to draw out key reflections in relation to policy indicators, inclusion criteria for policy documents, languages and analysis, quality assurance and sustainability. The process of developing the Database evolved iteratively in response to many factors, including the content of policies and the specificities of policy-making in each jurisdiction. Pragmatic decisions about the number of indicators and the types of policies to review were informed by pilot tests across a range of geographies. Standardization of analysis and data entry was ensured through the provision of in-depth guidance for researchers, and regular and open communication within the team was key to quality assurance. Online translation services enabled a review of policy documents in most languages. Documentation of the methodology ensured that others could replicate processes with fidelity in the future. Despite complexities, it is possible to develop a sound methodology for analysing the content of policy documents in a manner that yields findings that are useful in holding governments accountable for the commitments to address VAW and other public health issues in policy.

Keywords: Violence against women; gender; health policy; policy analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no disclosures to make nor do any authors have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of the VAW Policies Database development from WHO (2021b)

References

    1. Johnson BR Jr, Lavelanet AF, Schlitt S. 2018. Global Abortion Policies Database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards. BMC International Health and Human Rights 18: 35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmor T, Freeman R, Okma K. 2005. Comparative perspectives and policy learning in the world of health care. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 7: 331–48.
    1. Raub A, Sprague A, Waisath W. et al. 2022. Utilizing a comparative policy resource from the WORLD policy analysis center covering constitutional rights, laws, and policies across 193 countries for outcome analysis, monitoring, and accountability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 24: 313–28.
    1. UNAIDS . No date. Laws and Policies: National Commitments and Policy Index. https://lawsandpolicies.unaids.org/about?lan=en, accessed 22 May 2023.
    1. Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H. et al. 2008. ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy and Planning 23: 308–17. - PMC - PubMed