Risk factors for device-related pressure injuries in general ward inpatients of a tertiary general hospital: A case-control study
- PMID: 37558560
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.07.006
Risk factors for device-related pressure injuries in general ward inpatients of a tertiary general hospital: A case-control study
Abstract
Aims: To identify the characteristics of device-related pressure injuries (DRPI) in general ward inpatients, and to confirm the DRPI risk factors by examining differences between a DRPI and non-DRPI group.
Methods: This study is a retrospective case-control study. High-risk adult patients for pressure injuries (rated at 16 points or less on the Braden scale) who were admitted to a general ward of a tertiary general hospital in South Korea from January 1 to September 30, 2021 were enrolled in this study. Among them, participants were selected by matching the patients with DRPI (n = 50) to the non-DRPI patient group (n = 100) in a ratio of 1:2.
Results: As for risk factors, longer hospitalization periods and the presence of oedema increased DRPI risk. In blood tests, higher glucose levels increased the risk by 1.03 times, and lower albumin levels increased the risk by 0.08 times. Furthermore, the risk of developing DRPI was 7.89 times higher when sedatives were administered.
Conclusions: Based on the DRPI risk factors identified in this study, patients who have oedema, who have long hospital stays, use sedatives and devices, have a low albumin level, and whose blood glucose is not well controlled should be recognized as having a high risk of developing DRPI. In order to prevent the development of DRPI, it is necessary to recognize risk factors at an early stage, increase actively preventive interventions. The results of this study contribute to recognizing the risk of DRPI in patients and evaluating risk factors for DRPI prevention.
Keywords: Equipment and supplies; Inpatient; Pressure ulcer; Risk factors.
Copyright © 2023 Tissue Viability Society / Society of Tissue Viability. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no potential conflict of interest. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients were participants in the study and nurses were involved in the design and conduct of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics and risk factors of facial pressure injuries in acute inpatients using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: A retrospective case control study.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Oct;78:103453. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103453. Epub 2023 May 10. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023. PMID: 37172467
-
Device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: An Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study.Aust Crit Care. 2021 Nov;34(6):561-568. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Feb 20. Aust Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 33622521
-
Analysis of the clinical features and risk factors of device-related pressure injuries in the operating room.Int Wound J. 2023 Mar;20(3):706-715. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13912. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 36787265 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in general ward inpatients: A systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2022 May 6;17(5):e0268024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268024. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35522654 Free PMC article.
-
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30702158 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials