Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 9;15(7):e41601.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.41601. eCollection 2023 Jul.

The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review

Petr Dostal et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Auto-injectors are medical devices designed for the self-administration of injections by patients and for easy administration by healthcare professionals in emergency situations. Although they vary in design and application, auto-injectors are typically built around a spring-loaded syringe. Despite their widespread use in a variety of clinical settings, there have been limited attempts to assess their reliability. This systematic review investigates the reliability of auto-injectors, identifies common causes of failure, and summarizes the overall rate of malfunction. A systematic review of research published on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. The relevant studies were assessed for their methodological quality and risk of bias prior to extracting key study outcomes on auto-injector reliability. Finally, a summary rate covering all eligible studies was calculated. The search identified a total of 110 articles, of which ten were found to be suitable for inclusion. The risk of bias was low, and the methodological quality was high across the ten studies. Out of a total of 2,964 injections administered from an auto-injector, there were 12 device malfunctions, giving a summary rate of 0.40% (±0.23) auto-injector failures. The causes of malfunction varied in nature, with the majority of cases (58.3%) not being specified or not identified. This review has demonstrated that auto-injectors are reliable devices. Although further research on the nature of malfunctions is needed, the low rate of malfunctions supports training programs for healthcare professionals and patients on the optimum use and maintenance of auto-injectors. It provides a rationale for their continued development.

Keywords: auto-injector; clinical development; clinical trial; delivery; drug; injection; pharmaceutical; pharmacology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The literature review process.

References

    1. Self-injectable epinephrine for allergic emergencies. Davis JE. J Emerg Med. 2009;37:57–62. - PubMed
    1. What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis? Frew AJ. Allergy. 2011;66:15–24. - PubMed
    1. Autoinjector - A smart device for emergency cum personal therapy. Roy A, Geetha RV, Magesh A, Vijayaraghavan R, Ravichandran V. Saudi Pharm J. 2021;29:1205–1215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Autoinjector device for rapid administration of drugs and antidotes in emergency situations and in mass casualty management. Vijayaraghavan R. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0300060520926019. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520926019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patient satisfaction with the new interferon beta-1b autoinjector (BETACONNECT™) Ziemssen T, Sylvester L, Rametta M, Ross AP. Neurol Ther. 2015;4:125–136. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources