Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 25:14:1194606.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1194606. eCollection 2023.

Biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus pumilus

Affiliations
Review

Biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus pumilus

Jakub Dobrzyński et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting bacteria are one of the most interesting methods of controlling fungal phytopathogens. These bacteria can participate in biocontrol via a variety of mechanisms including lipopeptide production, hydrolytic enzymes (e.g., chitinase, cellulases, glucanase) production, microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) production, and induced systemic resistance (ISR) triggering. Among the bacterial genera most frequently studied in this aspect are Bacillus spp. including Bacillus pumilus. Due to the range of biocontrol traits, B. pumilus is one of the most interesting members of Bacillus spp. that can be used in the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens. So far, a number of B. pumilus strains that exhibit biocontrol properties against fungal phytopathogens have been described, e.g., B. pumilus HR10, PTB180, B. pumilus SS-10.7, B. pumilus MCB-7, B. pumilus INR7, B. pumilus SE52, SE34, SE49, B. pumilus RST25, B. pumilus JK-SX001, and B. pumilus KUDC1732. B. pumilus strains are capable of suppressing phytopathogens such as Arthrobotrys conoides, Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Fagopyrum esculentum. Importantly, B. pumilus can promote plant growth regardless of whether it alters the native microbiota or not. However, in order to increase its efficacy, research is still needed to clarify the relationship between the native microbiota and B. pumilus. Despite that, it can already be concluded that B. pumilus strains are good candidates to be environmentally friendly and commercially effective biocontrol agents.

Keywords: Bacillus; biological control; eco-friendly agent; pathogenic organisms; spore-forming bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbas A., Khan S. U., Khan W. U., Saleh T. A., Khan M. H. U., Ullah S., et al. (2019). Antagonist effects of strains of Bacillus spp. against Rhizoctonia solani for their protection against several plant diseases: alternatives to chemical pesticides. C. R. Biol. 342 124–135. 10.1016/j.crvi.2019.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agarwal M., Dheeman S., Dubey R. C., Kumar P., Maheshwari D. K., Bajpai V. K. (2017). Differential antagonistic responses of Bacillus pumilus MSUA3 against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum causing fungal diseases in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Microbiol. Res. 205 40–47. 10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alam M., Mizutani T., Isono M., Nikaidou N., Watanabe T. (1996). Three chitinase genes (chiA, chiC and chiD) comprise the chitinase system of Bacillus circulans WL-12. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 82 28–36. 10.1016/0922-338X(96)89450-5 - DOI
    1. Andersen R. A., Hamiltonkemp T. R., Hildebrand D. F., Mccracken C. T., Collins R. W., Fleming P. D. (1994). Structure-antifungal activity relationships among volatile C-6 and C-9 aliphatic-aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42 1563–1568. 10.1021/jf00043a033 - DOI
    1. Ansari F. A., Ahmad I. (2019). Isolation, functional characterization and efficacy of biofim forming rhizobacteria under abiotic stress conditions. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 112 1827–1839. 10.1007/s10482-019-01306-3 - DOI - PubMed