Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10:12:e47711.
doi: 10.2196/47711.

e-Cigarette Use and the Cessation of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking: Protocol for an Umbrella Review

Affiliations

e-Cigarette Use and the Cessation of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking: Protocol for an Umbrella Review

Renee O'Leary et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), commonly called e-cigarettes, have been examined in clinical studies for their effects on tobacco smoking cessation. In the past 2 years, a dozen or more systematic reviews on ENDS and cigarette smoking cessation have been published that present differing conclusions and recommendations on the use of ENDS.

Objective: Our umbrella review aims to synthesize the findings from current systematic reviews to investigate the quit rates and the percentage of participants abstinent from cigarette smoking using ENDS. Additionally, we will examine the quit rates with ENDS in comparison to other established cessation treatments.

Methods: The search will retrieve systematic reviews that include both clinical trials and experimental studies on the use of ENDS for smoking cessation. We will also include nonrandomized cohort studies that track ENDS use and the subsequent abstinence from smoking. Databases searches will be conducted in Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and 7 additional registries. Secondary searches will include reference checking, citation chasing, and consultations with topic experts. Two reviewers will perform a title and abstract exclusion followed by a full-paper inclusion process. Data extraction will be conducted by 1 reviewer and completely checked by a second reviewer. Each systematic review will be assessed by 2 reviewers for methodological quality using AMSTAR2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2) and for reporting bias using categories from the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's Catalogue of Bias. Unreported discrepancies between the protocol and the published review will be identified.

Results: The umbrella review started on March 1, 2023. At the time of publication, the study selection was being conducted and the pilot testing of the data extraction and bias assessment forms were in progress. The review is expected to be completed by December 31, 2023, followed by the submission of the review for journal publication. A second-order meta-analysis will calculate the range and average of quit rates for ENDS. A vote counting of the direction of effect, based on quit rates, will be used to present the relative effectiveness of ENDS for smoking cessation compared to other cessation treatments (including no treatment). A citation matrix will list primary studies with their bias ratings from all the systematic reviews. The effect of overlapping studies between the systematic reviews will be calculated using the corrected coverage area analysis. A sensitivity analysis will examine the impact of the intensity of cessation treatment on quit rates. Depending on the availability of data, subgroup analyses will be conducted based on participants' gender, age, prior quit attempts, and nicotine dependence. The strength or weakness of the evidence synthesis will be assessed using a stratification of evidence technique. Reporting bias will be presented with a tabulation of bias indicators. Publication bias will be assessed.

Conclusions: The use of ENDS for smoking cessation is a highly controversial subject. Through an exhaustive synthesis of the available data, we will present the quit rates of cigarette smoking cessation obtained with ENDS and how they compare to quit rates obtained from other established cessation treatments. The critical quality and bias assessment of the systematic reviews will indicate the most reliable sources to inform treatment considerations and policy development.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42023406165; https://tinyurl.com/4ekzpbrj.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/47711.

Keywords: A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2; AMSTAR2; ENDS; cessation; cigarette; e-cigarettes; electronic nicotine delivery systems; meta-analyses; meta-analysis; quit; review methodology; smoker; smoking; systematic; systematic reviews; umbrella review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: RO is supported by a contract with ECLAT Srl. ECLAT Srl has received funding from the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World. RP has received grants from U-BIOPRED and AIR-PROM, Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists Network (IRIS), Foundation for a Smoke-Free World, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, CV Therapeutics, NeuroSearch A/S, Sandoz, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Arbi Group Srl, Duska Therapeutics, Forest Laboratories, and Ministero dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca (MUR) Bando PNRR 3277/2021 (CUP E63C22000900006) and 341/2022 (CUP E63C22002080006), funded by NextGenerationEU, the European Union (EU) economic recovery package. He is the founder of the Center for Tobacco Prevention and Treatment (CPCT) at the University of Catania and of the Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction at the same university. He receives consultancy fees from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Duska Therapeutics, Forest Laboratories, CV Therapeutics, and Sermo Inc. He is being paid textbook royalties from Elsevier. He is also involved in a patent application for ECLAT Srl. He is a pro bono scientific advisor for Lega Italiana Anti Fumo (LIAF) and the International Network of Nicotine Consumers Organizations (INNCO). He is Chair of the European Technical Committee for Standardization on “requirements and test methods for emissions of electronic cigarettes” (CEN/TC 437/WG4).

Similar articles

References

    1. Boseley S. Hon Lik invented the e-cigarette to quit smoking - but now he's a dual user. The Guardian. 2015. [2023-01-31]. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jun/09/hon-lik-e-cigarette-inve... .
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice. Committee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems . Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US); 2018.
    1. Goniewicz ML, Smith DM, Edwards KC, Blount BC, Caldwell KL, Feng J, Wang L, Christensen C, Ambrose B, Borek N, van Bemmel D, Konkel K, Erives G, Stanton CA, Lambert E, Kimmel HL, Hatsukami D, Hecht SS, Niaura RS, Travers M, Lawrence C, Hyland AJ. Comparison of nicotine and toxicant exposure in users of electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 07;1(8):e185937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5937. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jam... 2718096 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Leary K. University of Victoria. Victoria Canada: 2018. Jun 01, [2023-07-24]. Vapour products/e-cigarettes: claims and evidence. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/9222 .