Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10;19(8):e1011284.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011284. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Ten simple rules for a mom-friendly Academia

Affiliations

Ten simple rules for a mom-friendly Academia

Esther Sebastián-González et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

Women (and all gender-discriminated people) are underrepresented in science, especially in leadership positions and higher stages of the scientific career. One of the main causes of career abandonment by women is maternity, with many women leaving Academia after having their first child because of the career penalties associated with motherhood. Thus, more actions to help scientific moms to balance family and academic work are urgently needed to increase representation of women and other gender discriminated people in Academia. Besides mothers, these rules may also benefit other groups such as mothers-to-be, fathers, caregivers, and women in general. Increasing women representation in science, including mothers, is critical because equality is a fundamental right, and because more diverse working environments are more productive and get to more optimal solutions. Here, we describe 10 simple rules that can be adopted in Academia to halt the abandonment of scientific careers by women after motherhood. We strongly encourage their implementation to increase gender diversity and equality in science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Pell AN. Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:2843–2848. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112843x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larivière V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nat News. 2013;504:211–213. doi: 10.1038/504211a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Astegiano J, Sebastián-González E, Castanho CT. Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a metanalytical review. R Soc Open Sci. 2019;6:181566. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arismendi I, Penaluna BE. Examining diversity inequities in fisheries science: a call to action. Bioscience. 2016;66:584–591.
    1. Giakoumi S, Pita C, Coll M, Fraschetti S, Gissi E, Katara I, et al. Persistent gender bias in marine science and conservation calls for action to achieve equity. Biol Conserv. 2021;257:109134.

Publication types