Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Aug;29(8):2041-2047.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02479-1. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Daratumumab monotherapy for refractory lupus nephritis

Affiliations
Case Reports

Daratumumab monotherapy for refractory lupus nephritis

Dario Roccatello et al. Nat Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Treatment-refractory lupus nephritis (LN) has a high risk of a poor outcome and is often life-threatening. Here we report a case series of six patients (one male and five females) with a median age of 41.3 years (range, 20-61 years) with refractory LN who received renal biopsies and were subsequently treated with intravenous daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (weekly for 8 weeks, followed by eight biweekly infusions and up to eight monthly infusions). One patient did not show any improvement after 6 months of therapy, and daratumumab was discontinued. In five patients, the mean disease activity, as assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity 2000 index, decreased from 10.8 before treatment to 3.6 at 12 months after treatment. Mean proteinuria (5.6 g per 24 h to 0.8 g per 24 h) and mean serum creatinine (2.3 mg dl-1 to 1.5 mg dl-1) also decreased after 12 months. Improvement of clinical symptoms was accompanied by seroconversion of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies; decreases in median interferon-gamma levels, B cell maturation antigen and soluble CD163 levels; and increases in C4 and interleukin-10 levels. These data suggest that daratumumab monotherapy warrants further exploration as a potential treatment for refractory LN.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work. The authors declare no conflicts of interest and declare no support from any organizations for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Laboratory profiles.
Trend of proteinuria, sCr, C3 and C4 in responder patients at baseline and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. n = 5 biologically independent samples were used for each determination (one per patient/timepoint). Box plots show median and 1st–3rd interquartile range; whiskers indicate minimum–maximum. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. uPt, proteinuria.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Serum concentrations of the INF-γ (shown as median and interquartile range), IL-10, sBCMA and sCD163 and scatter dot plots with results shown as median and range.
*P < 0.05. TO, baseline; T6, 6 months; T12, 12 months. n = 5 biologically independent samples were used for each determination (one per patient/timepoint). The Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test was applied to investigate variations in parameters after treatment. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Immunological profiles.
ad, Top panels: Associations of serum. IFN-γ (pg ml−1) (a), sBCMA (ng ml−1) (b), sCD163 (pg ml−1) (c), IL-10 (pg ml−1) (d), and disease activity in SLE patients. Cytochines levels are expressed in ng ml−1. Rs: Spearman’s correlation coefficient, SLEDAI-2K: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity 2000 Index. Middle panel: Correlation matrix heat map of sBCMA and the cytokines IFN-γ, sCD163 and IL-10. Bottom panel: Serum levels of anti-dsDNA (scatter dot plots with results shown as median and range). T0, baseline; T3, 3 months; T6, 6 months; T12, 12 months. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to assess correlations between parameters. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

References

    1. Kaul A, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16039. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.39. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roccatello D, Sciascia S, Rossi D, Fenoglio R. Refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: identification and pharmacological management. Drugs. 2023;83:117–134. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01824-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yee CS, et al. EULAR randomised controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone versus continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone in lupus nephritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004;63:525–529. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.003574. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin HA, III, et al. Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986;314:614–619. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198603063141004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mok CC, To CH, Yu KL, Ho LY. Combined low-dose mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for lupus nephritis with suboptimal response to standard therapy: a 12-month prospective study. Lupus. 2013;22:1135–1141. doi: 10.1177/0961203313502864. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types