Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 6;115(12):1605-1615.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad155.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer: report from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors

Affiliations

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced penile cancer: report from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors

Talal El Zarif et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for penile squamous cell carcinoma are limited. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes and safety profiles of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2015 and 2022 across 24 centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rates were determined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Two-sided statistical tests were used for comparisons.

Results: Among 92 patients, 8 (8.7%) were Asian, 6 (6.5%) were Black, and 24 (29%) were Hispanic and/or Latinx. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-70) years. In all, 83 (90%) had metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma, and 74 (80%) had received at least second-line treatment. Most patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 26 [28%]), combination nivolumab-ipilimumab with or without multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 23 [25%]), or nivolumab (n = 16 [17%]) or cemiplimab (n = 15 [16%]) monotherapies. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval = 7.7 to 12.8 months) and 3.2 months (95% confidence interval = 2.5 to 4.2 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 13% (n = 11/85) in the overall cohort and 35% (n = 7/20) in patients with lymph node-only metastases. Visceral metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or higher, and a higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with worse overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (29%) patients, and 9.8% (n = 9) of the events were grade 3 or higher.

Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in a subset of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. Future translational studies are warranted to identify patients more likely to derive clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Talal El Zarif reports honoraria from Art tempi. Amin H. Nassar acknowledges support from the Prime Center (SW-011); Consultant: The Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN); Writing/Editor fees: editor of Elsevier Practice Update Bladder Cancer Center of Excellence. Bassel Nazha has served as an advisory board member for Exelixis, paid consultant for Cardinal Health, paid case discussant for AmerisourceBergen, and a speaker (education) from Medical Logix. Andrew W. Hahn is on the advisory board of Janssen and Intellisphere; travel support: Dava Oncology. Noha Abdel-Wahab received a K01 Mentored Research Scientist Development Award from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI163412) and received the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Research Grant, Division of Internal Medicine Development Award, and Survivorship Seed Money Award; received speaker fees and consulting fees from ChemoCentryx. Marco Maruzzo is on the advisory board of MSD, BMS, Merck Serono, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, EISAI, Bayer, and IPSEN. Yuanquan Yang is on the advisory board of Exelixis; Consulting and Honoraria: The Whiteoak Group, AstraZeneca; Research support to institution: Incyte, Amgen, Novartis. Lorenzo Antonuzzo reports research funding (to institution) from Novartis, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; personal honoraria as invited speaker from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, AstraZeneca, Amgen, and MSD; participation in advisory board for Amgen, Merk Serono, Ely Lilly, AstraZeneca, Incite, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, and MSD. Rana R. McKay is a consultant/advisory board Aveo, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Calithera, Caris, Dendreon, Exelixis, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Myovant, Novartis, Pfizer, Sorrento Therapeutics, SeaGen, Sanofi, Telix, and Tempus; research funding from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Oncternal, and Tempus. Alessio Cortellini acknowledges consultant/Scientific Advisory Board roles at MSD, AstraZeneca, and IQVIA; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, and EISAI; and writing/editor fees from BMS. Ravindran Kanesvaran is a speaker, on the advisory board, and received honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Astellas, Eisai, Ipsen, Bayer, and Johnson &Johnson. Alberto Farolfi has received personal honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, GSK-Tesaro, and Clovis and institutional research grants from Astellas, MSD, and Bayer; was on the advisory board of Janssen, AstraZeneca, and GSK-Tesaro. Matthew I. Milowsky stock and other ownership interests in Pfizer, Merck, Gilead Sciences; consulting or advisory role with Loxo/Lilly; research funding (institution) from Merck, Roche/Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seagen, G1 Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics, Incyte, Alliance Foundation Trials, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Clovis Oncology, Arvinas, ALX Oncology, Loxo, and Hoosier Cancer Research Network; and other relationships with Elsevier (co-editor, Clinical Genitourinary Cancer) and Medscape. Toni K. Choueiri reports institutional or personal paid or unpaid support for research, advisory boards, consultancy, and honoraria from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, IQVA, Infinity, Ipsen, Janssen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Nuscan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, and others), outside the submitted work; institutional patents filed on molecular alterations and immunotherapy response/toxicity, and ctDNA; equity in Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio, CureResponse; committees include NCCN, GU Steering Committee, ASCO/ESMO, ACCRU, and KidneyCan; medical writing and editorial assistance support may have been funded by Communications companies in part; no speaker’s bureau; mentored several non-US citizens on research projects with potential funding (in part) from non-US sources/foreign components. The institution (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) may have received additional independent funding of drug companies or royalties potentially involved in research around the subject matter. T. K. Choueiri is supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE (2P50CA101942-16) and Program 5P30CA006516-56, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, Pan Mass Challenge, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Fund and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFCI. Guru P. Sonpavde is on the advisory board of EMD Serono, BMS, Merck, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Janssen, Bicycle Therapeutics, Pfizer, Gilead, Scholar Rock, G1 Therapeutics, Eli Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Lucence Health, IMV, and Vial; a consultant/scientific advisory board of Suba Therapeutics, Syapse; research support to institution from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Helsinn, Lucence, EMD Serono, Jazz Therapeutics, Genecentric; is a speaker for BIO—INFORMAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ONCOLOGIA Ltd, Seagen, Gilead, Natera, Exelixis; data safety monitoring committee (honorarium) from Mereo; Employment: Spouse employed by Myriad; Writing/Editor fees: Uptodate, editor of Elsevier Practice Update Bladder Cancer Center of Excellence

The remaining authors report that there are no potential competing interests pertaining to this work.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) of 92 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–based regimens.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival by neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and status of visceral metastases. ICI = immune checkpoint inhibitor.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A.. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33. - PubMed
    1. Clark PE, Spiess PE, Agarwal N, et al.; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Penile cancer: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(5):594-615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Care Network. NCCN Guidelines: Penile Cancer.https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/. Accessed March 1, 2023.
    1. Joshi VB, Chadha J, Chahoud J.. Penile cancer: updates in systemic therapy. Asian J Urol. 2022;9(4):374-388. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pagliaro LC, Williams DL, Daliani D, et al.Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3851-3857. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances