Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 26:14:1129039.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129039. eCollection 2023.

Staff training in physical interventions: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

Staff training in physical interventions: a literature review

Andrew A McDonnell et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Restrictive practices are used frequently by frontline staff in a variety of care contexts, including psychiatric hospitals, children's services, and support services for older adults and individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Physical restraint has been associated with emotional harm, physical injury to staff and consumers, and has even resulted in death of individuals in care environments. Various interventions have been implemented within care settings with the intention of reducing instances of restraint. One of the most common interventions is staff training that includes some physical intervention skills to support staff to manage crisis situations. Despite physical intervention training being used widely in care services, there is little evidence to support the effectiveness and application of physical interventions. This review will examine the literature regarding outcomes of staff training in physical interventions across care sectors.

Method: A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using Cochrane Database, Medline EBSCO, Medline OVID, PsychINFO, and the Web of Science. Main search keywords were staff training, physical intervention, physical restraint. The MMAT was utilised to provide an analytical framework for the included studies.

Results and discussion: Seventeen articles have been included in this literature review. The included studies take place in a range of care settings and comprise a wide range of outcomes and designs. The training programmes examined vary widely in their duration, course content, teaching methods, and extent to which physical skills are taught. Studies were of relatively poor quality. Many descriptions of training programmes did not clearly operationalise the knowledge and skills taught to staff. As such, it is difficult to compare course content across the studies. Few papers described physical interventions in sufficient detail. This review demonstrates that, although staff training is a 'first response' to managing health and safety in care settings, there is very little evidence to suggest that staff training in physical intervention skills leads to meaningful outcomes.

Keywords: physical interventions; restraint; seclusion; seclusion and restraint reduction; staff training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The lead researcher, AM, is also a director of Studio 3 Training Systems Ltd. Authors MO’S, SB-P and HM were employed by company Studio 3 Training Systems Ltd. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.The authors declare that this study received funding from Studio 3 Training Systems Ltd. The funder had the following involvement in the study: The lead researcher, Professor Andrew McDonnell, is a director of Studio 3 Training Systems Ltd. Authors Marion O’Shea, Stephanie Bews-Pugh and Hannah McAuliffe were employees of Studio 3 Training Systems Ltd at the time of their contribution to the literature review. The remaining author, Roy Deveaux, does not have a commercial or financial relationship with the funders.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. McDonnell A. The effectiveness of staff training in physical interventions In: Allen D, editor. Ethical approaches to physical interventions. 2nd ed. Avon: BILD publications; (2009).
    1. Chieze M, Hurst S, Kaiser S, Sentissi O. Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psych. (2019) 10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deveau R, McDonnell A. As the last resort: reducing the use of restrictive physical interventions using organisational approaches. Br J Learn Disabil. (2009) 37:172–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00536.x - DOI
    1. Allen D. Recent research on physical aggression in persons with intellectual disability: an overview. J Intellect Dev Dis. (2000) 25:41–57. doi: 10.1080/132697800112776 - DOI
    1. Reitan SK, Helvik AS, Iversen V. Use of mechanical and pharmacological restraint over an eight-year period and its relation to clinical factors. Nord J Psychiatry. (2018) 72:24–30. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1373854 - DOI - PubMed