Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 25:14:1208856.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1208856. eCollection 2023.

Validation of natural language processing methods capturing semantic incoherence in the speech of patients with non-affective psychosis

Affiliations

Validation of natural language processing methods capturing semantic incoherence in the speech of patients with non-affective psychosis

Sandra Anna Just et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Impairments in speech production are a core symptom of non-affective psychosis (NAP). While traditional clinical ratings of patients' speech involve a subjective human factor, modern methods of natural language processing (NLP) promise an automatic and objective way of analyzing patients' speech. This study aimed to validate NLP methods for analyzing speech production in NAP patients.

Methods: Speech samples from patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were obtained at two measurement points, 6 months apart. Out of N = 71 patients at T1, speech samples were also available for N = 54 patients at T2. Global and local models of semantic coherence as well as different word embeddings (word2vec vs. GloVe) were applied to the transcribed speech samples. They were tested and compared regarding their correlation with clinical ratings and external criteria from cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements.

Results: Results did not show differences for global vs. local coherence models and found more significant correlations between word2vec models and clinically relevant outcome variables than for GloVe models. Exploratory analysis of longitudinal data did not yield significant correlation with coherence scores.

Conclusion: These results indicate that natural language processing methods need to be critically validated in more studies and carefully selected before clinical application.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; automated analysis; coherence; formal thought disorder; natural language processing; psychosis; schizophrenia; speech analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Covington MA, He C, Brown C, Naçi L, McClain JT, Fjordbak BS, et al. . Schizophrenia and the structure of language: the linguist's view. Schizophr Res. (2005) 77:85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roche E, Creed L, MacMahon D, Brennan D, Clarke M. The epidemiology and associated phenomenology of formal thought disorder: a systematic review. Schizophr Bull. (2015) 41:951–62. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu129, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mercado CL, Johannesen JK, Bell MD. Thought disorder severity in compromised, deteriorated, and preserved intellectual course of schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2011) 199:111–6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182083bae, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreasen NC, Grove WM. Thought, language, and communication in schizophrenia: diagnosis and prognosis. Schizophr Bull. (1986) 12:348–59. doi: 10.1093/schbul/12.3.348, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaspers K. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. 9 (based on the unchanged 4th edition of 1946) ed. Berlin: Springer; (1973).