Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):1951.
doi: 10.3390/cells12151951.

Inducible Rbpms-CreERT2 Mouse Line for Studying Gene Function in Retinal Ganglion Cell Physiology and Disease

Affiliations

Inducible Rbpms-CreERT2 Mouse Line for Studying Gene Function in Retinal Ganglion Cell Physiology and Disease

Luming Guo et al. Cells. .

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the sole output neurons conveying visual stimuli from the retina to the brain, and dysfunction or loss of RGCs is the primary determinant of visual loss in traumatic and degenerative ocular conditions. Currently, there is a lack of RGC-specific Cre mouse lines that serve as invaluable tools for manipulating genes in RGCs and studying the genetic basis of RGC diseases. The RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS) is identified as the specific marker of all RGCs. Here, we report the generation and characterization of a knock-in mouse line in which a P2A-CreERT2 coding sequence is fused in-frame to the C-terminus of endogenous RBPMS, allowing for the co-expression of RBPMS and CreERT2. The inducible Rbpms-CreERT2 mice exhibited a high recombination efficiency in activating the expression of the tdTomato reporter gene in nearly all adult RGCs as well as in differentiated RGCs starting at E13.5. Additionally, both heterozygous and homozygous Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in mice showed no detectable defect in the retinal structure, visual function, and transcriptome. Together, these results demonstrated that the Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in mouse can serve as a powerful and highly desired genetic tool for lineage tracing, genetic manipulation, retinal physiology study, and ocular disease modeling in RGCs.

Keywords: Cre recombinase; RGC and axonal degeneration; RGC development; glaucoma; optic neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Generation and confirmation of Rbpms-CreERT2 mice. (A) Rbpms-CreERT2 targeting strategy by fusing P2A-CreERT2 sequence in-frame to the C-terminus of Rbpms. (B) Representative long-range PCR amplification results show the 742 bp external fragment at 5′ and the 2072 bp amplicon at 3′ of knock-in sequence, confirming the correct allele using 5′ and 3′ external primer sets, respectively. (C) Representative PCR genotyping of a litter from crossing of RbpmsCreERT2/+ mice identify a 335 bp Cre fragment and a 347 bp wild type fragment, confirming the correct targets using Cre and Rbpms wt primers, respectively. (D) Co-labeling with anti-RBPMS and anti-CRE antibodies in 6 weeks retinas show the overlapping expression of CreERT2 and endogenous RBPMS. (E) Immunostaining with antibodies against RBPMS and POU4F1 of wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 retinal whole-mounts show the similar expression of RBPMS and POU4F1 in the ganglion cell layer (GCL). (F,G) Quantification of the RBPMS+ (F) and POU4F1+ (G) cells reveals no significantly difference among wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 retinas. n = 3. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ONL and INL denote outer nuclear layer and inner nuclear layer, respectively. Scale bars equal 50 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in does not alter retinal structure and transcriptome. (A) Representative images of H&E stained retinal cryosections reveal comparable retinal cellular structure among the wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice. (B) Quantification of cell number in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) within 250 µm × 250 µm region shows no significant changes among the wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice. (C,D) Volcano plots display the RNA-Seq results. Note that using the criteria of adjusted p < 0.05 and fold change > 2, no differentially expressed gene (DEG) with significant change is identified (C) between wild type and RbpmsCreERT2/+ retinas and (D) between wild type and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 retinas. (EJ) Heatmaps show the expression level of selected genes expressed in individual retinal cell types. Note that there is no significant difference among the control, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 retinas of in the expression of marker genes specific for (E) retinal ganglion cell (RGC), (F) photoreceptor cell (PC), (G) horizontal cell (HC), (H) bipolar cell (BC), (I) amacrine cell (AC), and (J) Müller glial cell (MC). The cutoff criteria are set as adjusted p < 0.05 and fold change > 2. n = 3. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ONL indicates outer nuclear layer, INL and GCL denote inner nuclear layer and ganglion cell layer, respectively. Scale bar equals 50 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analysis of Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in effects on visual function and retinal fundus features. (A,B) Optomotor response measurements show no significant changes in (A) visual acuity and (B) contract sensitivity among wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice. (C) Pattern electroretinography (PERG) was performed on the same mice with the 50 cd.s/m2 “natural” stimulus, averaged amplitude of P1 and N2 components from representative wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice does not exhibit overt differences between each of the two groups. (D) Quantification of amplitudes of P1 and N2 in PERG. (E,F) Representative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images (E) and measurement of each layer thickness evaluated by OCT (F) show no significant difference among wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice. (G) Fluorescein angiography (FA) examination reveals comparable retinal vessel features among wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+ and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice. n = 4. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (D) or two-way ANOVA (F). Scale bars equal 300 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Assessment of Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in effects on retinal function. (A) Representative scotopic ERG waveforms from the wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+, and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice at P42. (B) Representative photopic ERG waveforms from the same mice tested after scotopic ERG. (C,D) Summary of luminance-response functions for the dark-adapted ERG (C) a-wave and (D) b-wave. Two-way ANOVA test revealed that heterozygous and homozygous Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in has no significant effect on either a-wave (F10, 54 = 0.36, p = 0.96) or b-wave (F10, 54 = 0.11, p = 1.0). (E,F) Summary of luminance-response functions for the light-adapted ERG (E) a-wave and (F) b-wave. No significant difference is seen among the wild type, RbpmsCreERT2/+, and RbpmsCreERT2/CreERT2 mice based on two-way ANOVA analysis of a-wave (F10, 54 = 0.53, p = 0.86) and b-wave (F10, 54 = 0.15, p = 1.0). n = 4. Data points represent the mean ± SEM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Assessment of Cre recombinase activity in RGCs of Rbpms-CreERT2 knock-in mice. (A) Representative images of flat-mount retinas of 8-week-old RbpmsCreERT2/+; Rosa26tdT/+ mice. One to three dosages of tamoxifen were administered starting at P50 and retinas were harvested 7 days later for immunolabeling with antibodies against RBPMS (green) and RFP (red) to detect tdTomato. (B) Representative enlarged views of flat-mount retinas in (A). (C) Representative images of immunolabeled retinal cryosections of 8-week-old RbpmsCreERT2/+; Rosa26tdT/+ mice with one to three dosages of tamoxifen. (D) Quantification of Rbpms-CreERT2 recombinase efficiency and (E) Quantification of Rbpms-CreERT2 recombinase specificity. The CreERT2-mediated recombination efficiency was calculated as the percentage of tdTomato+-RBPMS+/total RGCs positive for RBPMS, the CreERT2-mediated recombination specificity was calculated as the percentage of tdTomato+-RBPMS+/total tdTomato positive RGCs driven by RBPMS. n = 3. ONL indicates outer nuclear layer; INL and GCL denote inner nuclear layer and ganglion cell layer, respectively. The scale bars in (A) equal 1 mm while those in (B,C) equal 50 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Characterization of Rbpms-CreERT2 recombinase activity during early retinal development. (A,B) Determination of the onset of RBPMS expression in RGCs. Cryosections of wild type developing retinas at (A) E11.5 and (B) E12.5 were immunolabeled with anti-RBPMS (green) and anti-POU4F1 (red) and nuclear counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrowheads indicate RBPMS expression and RBPMS-POU4F1 co-expression in the central retina ((B), left and central panels, respectively). Far right panels show the enlarged views of the boxed regions. (CE) Representative images of retinal cryosections immunolabeled for RBPMS, tdTomato (RFP) and POU4F2 after induction by a single dosage of tamoxifen. IP injection of tamoxifen was administered at (C) E11.5, (D) E12.5, and (E) E13.5, and retinas were collected for immunolabeling 2 days after tamoxifen induction at E13.5, E14.5, and E15.5, respectively. DAPI (blue) was used to stain the nuclei. Far right panels show the enlarged views of the boxed regions. Scale bars equal 250 μm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cre recombinase activity in differentiated RGCs of embryonic RbpmsCreERT2/+; Rosa26tdT/+ mice. Representative images of retinal cryosections of RbpmsCreERT2/+; Rosa26tdT/+ mice immunolabeled with anti-RBPMS (green), anti-RFP (red), and anti-CDKN1B (grey) and nuclear counterstained with DAPI (blue). Tamoxifen was administered at (A) E11.5, (B) E12.5, and (C) E13.5 and retinas were collected for immunolabeling 2 days after tamoxifen induction at E13.5, E14.5, and E15.5, respectively. Far right panels show the enlarged views of the boxed regions. n = 3. Scale bars equal 250 μm.

References

    1. Jeon C.J., Strettoi E., Masland R.H. The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:8936–8946. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08936.1998. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masland R.H. The Neuronal Organization of the Retina. Neuron. 2012;76:266–280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dräger U.C., Olsen J.F. Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981;20:285–293. - PubMed
    1. Pang J.-J., Wu S.M. Morphology and Immunoreactivity of Retrogradely Double-Labeled Ganglion Cells in the Mouse Retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52:4886–4896. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5921. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kong J.-H., Fish D.R., Rockhill R.L., Masland R.H. Diversity of ganglion cells in the mouse retina: Unsupervised morphological classification and its limits. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005;489:293–310. doi: 10.1002/cne.20631. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types