Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327198.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27198.

Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario

Affiliations

Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario

Vasily Giannakeas et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: A body of pathological and clinical evidence supports the position that the fallopian tube is the site of origin for a large proportion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Consequently, salpingectomy is now considered for permanent contraception (in lieu of tubal ligation) or ovarian cancer prevention (performed opportunistically at the time of surgical procedures for benign gynecologic conditions).

Objective: To evaluate the association between salpingectomy and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study included all women aged 18 to 80 years who were eligible for health care services in Ontario, Canada. Participants were identified using administrative health databases from Ontario between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019. A total of 131 516 women were included in the primary (matched) analysis. Women were followed up until December 31, 2021.

Exposures: Salpingectomy (with and without hysterectomy) vs no pelvic procedure (control condition) among women in the general population.

Main outcomes and measures: Women with a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy in Ontario between April 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019, were matched 1:3 to women with no pelvic procedure from the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer combined.

Results: Among 131 516 women (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [7.6] years), 32 879 underwent a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, and 98 637 did not undergo a pelvic procedure. After a mean (range) follow-up of 7.4 (0-29.2) years in the salpingectomy group and 7.5 (0-29.2) years in the nonsurgical control group, there were 31 incident cancers (0.09%) and 117 incident cancers (0.12%), respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.21). The HR for cancer incidence was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.44) when comparing those with salpingectomy vs those with hysterectomy alone.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, no association was found between salpingectomy and the risk of ovarian cancer; however, this observation was based on few incident cases and a relatively short follow-up time. Studies with additional years of follow-up are necessary to define the true level of potential risk reduction with salpingectomy, although longer follow-up will also be a challenge unless collaborative efforts that pool data are undertaken.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lipscombe reported receiving personal fees from the Novo Nordisk Network for Healthy Populations at the University of Toronto outside the submitted work. Dr Narod reported receiving a Tier I Canada Research Chair outside the submitted work. Dr Kotsopoulos reported receiving a Tier II Canada Research Chair outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Frequencies of Hysterectomy, Salpingectomy, and Tubal Ligation in Ontario From 2003 to 2021
Information on procedure type was obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract database for inpatient procedures and the Same-Day Surgery database for outpatient procedures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario Among Women Undergoing Salpingectomy vs No Surgical Procedure
Ovarian cancer includes invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Log-rank P = .31.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian cancer statistics 2022. November 2022. Accessed March 2023. https://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics/canadian-cancer-statistics.
    1. Sopik V, Iqbal J, Rosen B, Narod SA. Why have ovarian cancer mortality rates declined? part II. case-fatality. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(3):750-756. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C, Peto R, Reeves G; Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer . Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):303-314. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60167-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, et al. . Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(1):77-102. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion No. 774: opportunistic salpingectomy as a strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):e279-e284. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003164 - DOI - PubMed